Plinkert P K, de Maddalena H
Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Tübingen.
HNO. 1996 Jun;44(6):313-8.
In order to assess occupational hearing loss, damage to outer hair cell function must be demonstrated. Measurements of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE) allow clinicians to investigate objectively the cochlear amplification process. In this prospective study, 50 persons with suspected occupational hearing losses were tested with pure-tone and speech audiometry. Additionally, TEOAE and DPAOE were determined. Significant linear correlations were observed when comparing hearing thresholds and speech discriminations with evoked emissions. Three groups were formed based on the OAE results: group A, TEOAE- and DPOAE-positive; group B, TEOAE-negative, DPOAE positive; group C, TEOAE- and DPOAE-negative. The groups were compared with regard to the weighted and simple discrimination scores and percentage of hearing loss computed according to the Boenninghaus-Röser tables. Analysis of variance showed significant differences in hearing losses among the three groups, allowing an objective statement to be made about the degree of work compromise: group A, < 10%; group B, 10-15% group C, > or = 20%.
为了评估职业性听力损失,必须证明外毛细胞功能受损。瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)的测量使临床医生能够客观地研究耳蜗放大过程。在这项前瞻性研究中,对50名疑似职业性听力损失的人员进行了纯音和言语听力测试。此外,还测定了TEOAE和DPAOE。在将听力阈值和言语辨别与诱发耳声发射进行比较时,观察到显著的线性相关性。根据耳声发射结果分为三组:A组,TEOAE和DPOAE均为阳性;B组,TEOAE阴性,DPOAE阳性;C组,TEOAE和DPOAE均为阴性。比较了三组的加权和简单辨别分数以及根据博宁豪斯-勒泽尔表计算的听力损失百分比。方差分析显示三组之间的听力损失存在显著差异,从而可以对工作损害程度做出客观陈述:A组,<10%;B组,10 - 15%;C组,≥20%。