Robillard T, Gillain M
Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Ste Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1996;50(2):115-20.
The present study is a report on a group of hearing-impaired patients all of whom received prescriptions for hearing aids. The lessons learned are the following: only two out of three patients followed up on their prescriptions. "Behind the ear" hearing aids (BTE) were the type most often fitted (79%) against a much lower number of "in the ear" hearing aids (ITE). Binaural fitting has become more widespread since coverage for two aids has been approved by the insurers. The patient is globally satisfied with his hearing aid. However, one out of two is dissatisfied with his auditory correction in a group conversation situation and this in spite of bilateral fittings. Further verification of the efficacy of stereoacoustic amplification is recommended as well as greater care in the initial programming of the aid. An increase in the marketing and sales of ITE prostheses is advisable thereby perhaps attracting hearing aid candidates otherwise reticent to wear conventional BTE type aids.
本研究报告了一组听力受损患者,他们均收到了助听器处方。得到的经验教训如下:三分之二的患者遵循了他们的处方。“耳背式”(BTE)助听器是最常佩戴的类型(79%),而“耳内式”(ITE)助听器的佩戴数量要少得多。自从保险公司批准为双耳佩戴提供保险后,双耳佩戴变得更为普遍。患者总体上对其助听器感到满意。然而,尽管是双耳佩戴,仍有二分之一的患者在集体对话情况下对其听力矫正不满意。建议进一步验证立体声放大的效果,并在助听器的初始编程中更加谨慎。建议增加ITE假体的营销和销售,从而可能吸引那些原本不愿佩戴传统BTE型助听器的潜在助听器使用者。