Suppr超能文献

[胰岛素瘤的诊断定位。25例孤立性肿瘤患者的经验]

[Diagnostic localization of insulinoma. Experiences with 25 patients with solitary tumors].

作者信息

Kisker O, Bastian D, Frank M, Rothmund M

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie, Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Jun 15;91(6):349-54.

PMID:8767307
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The most effective way to localize the mostly small ( < 2 cm), benign and solitary insulinomas is still under discussion. Especially the evaluation of the different preoperative localization methods is not clarified. The aim of our study was to support the ongoing discussion in that matter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total 25 patients have been included in our study since 1987. All showed sporadic insulinomas and underwent surgery. The following preoperative localization methods had been used: ultrasonography (US): 25 patients, computed tomography (CT): 23 patients, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS): four patients since 1990, angiography: six patients, endosonography (ES): five patients since 1995, selective portal venous sampling (PVS): two patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): four patients since 1993. All 25 patients underwent a bidigital palpation in combination with intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS). Four of the 25 patients were reoperated and had a prior unsuccessful operation elsewhere.

RESULTS

Preoperatively 19 of 25 insulinomas were localized (76%). The following sensitivity rates had been found: ultrasonography: 56%, computed tomography: 43%, endosonography: 100%, angiography: 66%, magnetic resonance imaging: 25%, selective portal venous sampling: 100%, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: 0%. All 25 insulinomas were detected during operation, 100% by palpation in combination with intraoperative ultrasonography and 92% by palpation on its own.

CONCLUSION

After an insulinoma is biochemically proven and after exclusion of a malignant metastasizing tumor by ultrasonography, all patients should be operated on. Intraoperative ultrasonography should be performed in any case. As other preoperative localization methods did not prove a convincing cost-utility-relation, one should not consider the usage of these methods before the initial operations. Before re-operations one should consider the use of costly pre-operative methods to localize insulinomas. Here endosonography and selective portal venous sampling are recommended as the first procedures of choice.

摘要

目的

对于大多数较小(<2 cm)、良性且孤立的胰岛素瘤,最有效的定位方法仍在讨论中。尤其是对不同术前定位方法的评估尚不明确。我们研究的目的是支持该问题的 ongoing 讨论。

患者与方法

自1987年以来,共有25例患者纳入我们的研究。所有患者均表现为散发性胰岛素瘤并接受了手术。使用了以下术前定位方法:超声检查(US):25例患者;计算机断层扫描(CT):23例患者;自1990年起,生长抑素受体闪烁显像(SRS):4例患者;血管造影:6例患者;自1995年起,内镜超声检查(ES):5例患者;选择性门静脉采血(PVS):2例患者;磁共振成像(MRI):自1993年起,4例患者。所有25例患者均接受了双指触诊并结合术中超声检查(IOUS)。25例患者中有4例接受了再次手术,且之前在其他地方的手术未成功。

结果

术前25例胰岛素瘤中有19例被定位(76%)。发现以下灵敏度:超声检查:56%;计算机断层扫描:43%;内镜超声检查:100%;血管造影:66%;磁共振成像:25%;选择性门静脉采血:100%;生长抑素受体闪烁显像:0%。所有25例胰岛素瘤在手术中均被检测到,触诊结合术中超声检查的检出率为100%,单纯触诊的检出率为92%。

结论

在胰岛素瘤经生化证实且通过超声排除恶性转移性肿瘤后,所有患者均应接受手术。无论如何都应进行术中超声检查。由于其他术前定位方法未证明令人信服的成本效益关系,在初次手术前不应考虑使用这些方法。在再次手术前,应考虑使用昂贵的术前方法来定位胰岛素瘤。在此,推荐内镜超声检查和选择性门静脉采血作为首选的第一步检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验