Suppr超能文献

棒框测验中的定向偏差。

Orientation bias in the Rod-and-Frame Test.

作者信息

Pitblado C

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1977 Jun;44(3 Pt 1):891-900. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.44.3.891.

Abstract

Rod-and-frame data for a sample of 21 males and 25 females showed marked asymmetries in the magnitudes of the frame effects for left and right frame-tilt. These asymmetries are interpreted as an underlying tendency for individuals to set the rod systematically clockwise or counterclockwise of true vertical, independently of the influence of the visible frame, and the term "orientation bias" is used to describe this tendency. 14 males and 14 females demonstrated orientation biases significantly different from zero. In group comparisons males differed significantly from females, the mean bias for males as a group lying significantly left (counterclockwise) of vertical while the mean for females as a group did not differ from zero. Implications for conventional measures of field dependence are discussed. Possible diagnostic significance of orientation performance for brain injury is also considered, and an unusual individual performance is described.

摘要

对21名男性和25名女性样本的杆框数据显示,左右框架倾斜的框架效应大小存在明显的不对称性。这些不对称性被解释为个体有独立于可见框架影响,将杆系统地设置在真垂线顺时针或逆时针方向的潜在倾向,术语“定向偏差”用于描述这种倾向。14名男性和14名女性表现出的定向偏差显著不同于零。在组间比较中,男性与女性有显著差异,男性组的平均偏差显著位于垂线左侧(逆时针方向),而女性组的平均值与零无差异。文中讨论了对传统场依存性测量方法的影响。还考虑了定向表现对脑损伤的可能诊断意义,并描述了一个不寻常的个体表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验