Suppr超能文献

拉姆斯泰德幽门肌切开术——正确的切口是什么?

Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy--what is the correct incision?

作者信息

Hingston G

机构信息

Starship Children's Health, Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1996 Jul 26;109(1026):276-8.

PMID:8769050
Abstract

AIM

To retrospectively review Starship's complication rates of the vertical midline incision and transverse right upper quadrant incision in Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy.

METHOD

A retrospective chart and operation note review over a seven and a half year period of all infants having a Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at Auckland Hospital.

RESULTS

Of 140 patients there were 117 transverse and 18 midline incisions (with 5 exclusions). No statistically significant differences were found between either group for wound, dehiscence, wound infection or incisional hernia. However, wound dehiscence occurred relatively more often in the midline group (2/18) than in the transverse group (3/117), although this did not reach statistical significance (Fisher exact test p-value = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no convincing evidence that either incision is better than the other. There is a low number of wound complications occurring at Starship with Ramstedt's operation. Overall results compare favourably with both New Zealand and overseas institutions.

摘要

目的

回顾性分析在施行了Ramstedt幽门肌切开术的患儿中,使用垂直中线切口和右上腹横切口的并发症发生率。

方法

回顾性分析奥克兰医院七年半内所有因婴儿肥厚性幽门狭窄接受Ramstedt幽门肌切开术的婴儿的病历和手术记录。

结果

140例患者中,117例采用横切口,18例采用中线切口(另有5例排除在外)。两组在伤口、裂开、伤口感染或切口疝方面均未发现统计学上的显著差异。然而,中线组伤口裂开发生率(2/18)相对高于横切组(3/117),尽管未达到统计学意义(Fisher精确检验p值=0.15)。

结论

没有令人信服的证据表明哪种切口更好。在施行了Ramstedt手术的星舰儿童医院,伤口并发症的发生率较低。总体结果与新西兰和海外机构相比具有优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验