Huang C H, Wang M J, Chen T L, Huang H H, Hsu H W, Susetio L, Liu C C
Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, ROC.
J Formos Med Assoc. 1996 Jun;95(6):496-9.
Thirty-five patients who underwent one-stage bilateral total knee replacement were included in this study to determine whether there was any difference in hemodynamic effects following the deflation of the first and second tourniquets. The values of hemodynamic variables were not significantly different immediately before either the first or the second tourniquet release as compared to preoperative values. The changes in heart rate after the release of the first and second tourniquets showed similar patterns. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after deflation of the first and second tourniquets. However, the decrease was more marked after the second tourniquet deflation. The level of central venous pressure decreased significantly after the release of the first and second tourniquets but the patterns of change were not significantly different. The need for administration of ephedrine was also higher after the deflation of the second tourniquet than after the first. We conclude that the blood pressure changes after the second tourniquet deflation are more pronounced than those following the first tourniquet deflation. Anesthesiologists must be aware of this phenomenon and prevent marked hemodynamic changes that could be detrimental to high-risk patients.
本研究纳入了35例行一期双侧全膝关节置换术的患者,以确定在第一和第二个止血带放气后血流动力学效应是否存在差异。与术前值相比,在第一或第二个止血带松开前,血流动力学变量的值无显著差异。第一和第二个止血带松开后心率的变化呈现相似模式。第一和第二个止血带放气后收缩压和舒张压显著下降。然而,第二个止血带放气后的下降更为明显。第一和第二个止血带松开后中心静脉压水平显著下降,但变化模式无显著差异。第二个止血带放气后麻黄碱的使用需求也高于第一个止血带放气后。我们得出结论,第二个止血带放气后的血压变化比第一个止血带放气后的更明显。麻醉医生必须意识到这一现象,并预防可能对高危患者有害的明显血流动力学变化。