Hamulyák K, Lensing A W, van der Meer J, Smid W M, van Ooy A, Hoek J A
Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Thromb Haemost. 1995 Dec;74(6):1428-31.
To compare efficacy, safety, and feasibility of adjusted-dose oral anticoagulants (OAC) versus fixed-dose subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients who have undergone elective hip or knee replacement.
Multicentre, single blind randomised trial. OAC (acenocoumarol, target International Normalised Ratio, 2.0-3.0) and LMWH (nadroparine, 60 aXa IU/kg once daily) were started preoperatively and continued for 10 days. All outcome measures were adjudicated by an independent committee unaware of treatment allocation.
672 consecutive patients scheduled for elective hip or knee replacement surgery. All patients wore bilateral graduated compression stockings.
The endpoint for the assessment of efficacy was venography confirmed DVT or confirmed symptomatic pulmonary embolism. The endpoint for the assessment of safety was clinically important bleeding during study treatment or within 48 h of the end of treatment.
Among the 517 patients with interpretable venograms, 391 had a hip replacement and 126 had a knee implant. DVT was demonstrated in 50 (20%) of 257 patients allocated to OAC and 43 (17%) of 260 patients allocated to nadroparine (p = 0.45), for an absolute difference in DVT incidence of 2.9% in favour of nadroparine (95% CI, -3.7-9.5). Clinically important bleeding occurred in eight (2.3%) of the 342 oral anticoagulant treated patients and in five (1.5%) of the 330 nadroparine treated patients (p = 0.62), for an absolute difference in favour of nadroparine of 0.8% (95% Cl, -1.3-2.9).
Patients who undergo major orthopaedic operations have a high risk of venous thromboembolism. Once daily fixed-dose subcutaneous nadroparine is at least as efficacious and safe as daily adjusted OAC for prophylaxis against DVT after hip or knee implantation but is more simple to administer.
比较调整剂量的口服抗凝剂(OAC)与固定剂量的皮下注射低分子肝素(LMWH)在预防择期髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者深静脉血栓形成(DVT)方面的疗效、安全性和可行性。
多中心、单盲随机试验。术前开始使用OAC(醋硝香豆素,目标国际标准化比值为2.0 - 3.0)和LMWH(那屈肝素,60抗Xa国际单位/千克,每日一次),持续10天。所有结局指标由一个不知道治疗分配情况的独立委员会判定。
672例连续安排进行择期髋关节或膝关节置换手术的患者。所有患者均穿着双侧分级压力弹力袜。
评估疗效的终点是静脉造影证实的DVT或确诊的有症状肺栓塞。评估安全性的终点是研究治疗期间或治疗结束后48小时内发生的具有临床意义的出血。
在517例有可解释静脉造影结果的患者中,391例行髋关节置换术,126例行膝关节置换术。在分配接受OAC治疗的257例患者中,有50例(20%)出现DVT;在分配接受那屈肝素治疗的260例患者中,有43例(17%)出现DVT(p = 0.45),DVT发生率的绝对差异为2.9%,那屈肝素更具优势(95%可信区间,-3.7 - 9.5)。在342例接受口服抗凝剂治疗的患者中,有8例(2.3%)发生具有临床意义的出血;在330例接受那屈肝素治疗的患者中,有5例(1.5%)发生出血(p = 0.62),那屈肝素的绝对优势为0.8%(95%可信区间,-1.3 - 2.9)。
接受大型骨科手术的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险很高。每日一次固定剂量皮下注射那屈肝素在预防髋关节或膝关节置换术后DVT方面至少与每日调整剂量的OAC一样有效和安全,但给药更简单。