Buenaventura R S, Sarkin A J
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, California 92182, USA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Jun;82(3 Pt 1):867-71. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.867.
The present study investigated reaction time with and without tapping as an interfering task. 66 undergraduate students were instructed to press and hold a button when a stimulus disappeared from a computer screen, then release it as quickly as possible when it reappeared at the end of each preparatory interval, using the preferred hand. Lengths of preparatory intervals were either 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 25 sec. and occurred sometimes in a regular sequence of preparatory intervals of the same length and sometimes in an irregular randomly ordered sequence. Half of the participants were assigned to tap the tabletop with the forefinger of the nonpreferred hand throughout the task. A 2 x 6 x 2 analysis of variance showed significant effects for regularity, length of preparatory interval, and the interaction between regularity and length of preparatory interval. A significant main effect for tapping indicated that reaction times were slower in the tapping group. There were no significant interactions between tapping and other variables, indicating that the pattern of reaction times did not differ significantly between the two groups. Tapping produces a dual-task interference that increases reaction time similarly across different conditions.
本研究调查了有无敲击作为干扰任务时的反应时间。66名本科生被要求用惯用手,在刺激物从电脑屏幕上消失时按下并按住一个按钮,然后在每个准备间隔结束时刺激物再次出现时尽快松开按钮。准备间隔的时长为1秒、2秒、4秒、8秒、16秒或25秒,有时以相同长度的准备间隔的规则序列出现,有时以不规则的随机顺序出现。一半的参与者被分配在整个任务过程中用非惯用手的食指轻敲桌面。一项2×6×2方差分析显示,准备间隔的规律性、时长以及规律性与时长之间的交互作用均有显著影响。敲击有显著的主效应,表明敲击组的反应时间较慢。敲击与其他变量之间没有显著的交互作用,表明两组之间的反应时间模式没有显著差异。敲击会产生双重任务干扰,在不同条件下类似地增加反应时间。