Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症患者在固定和可变准备间隔下的手动和扫视反应时间

Manual and saccadic reaction time with constant and variable preparatory intervals in schizophrenia.

作者信息

Zahn T P, Roberts B R, Schooler C, Cohen R

机构信息

Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1366, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 May;107(2):328-37. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.2.328.

Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (RT) has been shown to be unimpaired in schizophrenia. Could this be due to its not requiring controlled information processing? The authors gave 49 schizophrenia patients and 34 controls manual and saccadic RT tasks with preparatory intervals of 1, 3, and 5 s given in regular and irregular sequences. If saccades require mainly automatic processes, they should not be affected by variations in the preparatory interval that are mediated by controlled processing. The manual task showed typical slower RT and larger preparatory interval effects in patients than in controls. Although the saccadic task showed significant effects of both the preparatory interval and the preparatory interval on the preceding trial similar in kind to those in manual RT, there were no group differences in these or in RT. The results are attributed to greater stimulus-response compatibility in the saccadic task, which puts fewer demands on working memory.

摘要

研究表明,精神分裂症患者的扫视反应时间(RT)并未受损。这是否是因为扫视反应不需要受控的信息处理呢?作者让49名精神分裂症患者和34名对照组人员进行手动和扫视RT任务,准备间隔分别为1秒、3秒和5秒,且按规则和不规则顺序给出。如果扫视主要需要自动过程,那么它们不应受到由受控处理介导的准备间隔变化的影响。手动任务显示,患者的RT通常比对照组慢,且准备间隔效应更大。尽管扫视任务显示出准备间隔及其前一试次的准备间隔都有显著影响,且与手动RT中的影响类似,但在这些方面或RT上没有组间差异。结果归因于扫视任务中更高的刺激 - 反应兼容性,这对工作记忆的要求较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验