Lessey B A, Yeh I, Castelbaum A J, Fritz M A, Ilesanmi A O, Korzeniowski P, Sun J, Chwalisz K
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7570, USA.
Fertil Steril. 1996 Mar;65(3):477-83.
To compare the expression of endometrial P receptors (PR) levels with markers of endometrial receptivity during the window of implantation.
Prospective, controlled study to examine endometrial PR and three cycle-specific integrins in endometrial biopsies obtained during the window of implantation.
An academic teaching hospital.
One hundred seventy-five endometrial biopsies from regularly cycling women with luteal phase defect (LPD; group 1; n = 80), medically treated LPD (group 2; n = 16), minimal and mild endometriosis with aberrant alpha v beta 3 expression (group 3; n = 21), fertile controls (group 4; n = 26), and infertile controls (group 5; n = 32).
Immunohistochemical staining intensity of each antigen using the semi-quantitative grading system (HSCORE), compared using analysis of variance with Scheffe's correction.
Among the five groups studied, nuclear PR expression was significantly elevated in glandular epithelial cells from tissue samples with histologic delay > or = 3 days consistent with luteal phase deficiency (LPD; group 1). Failure of PR down-regulation was associated with aberrant alpha v beta 3 integrin expression. Medical correction of LPD was associated with return of normal endometrial histology, normal integrin expression, and the loss of epithelial PR, similar to controls. The other two cycle-dependent integrin markers, alpha 1 beta 1 and alpha 4 beta 1, were not different between groups. In women with aberrant alpha v beta 3 and "in phase" endometrium, epithelial PR expression was not different from controls.
The establishment of normal endometrial receptivity appears to be tightly associated with the down-regulation of epithelial PR. Histologic delay, consistent with LPD, is associated with a failure of PR down-regulation and the lack of normal markers of endometrial receptivity. Occult uterine receptivity defects (aberrant beta 3 expression in otherwise normal histology) are regulated differently, suggesting alternate mechanisms also exist which influence endometrial receptivity.
比较植入窗期子宫内膜孕激素受体(PR)水平的表达与子宫内膜容受性标志物。
前瞻性对照研究,检测植入窗期获取的子宫内膜活检组织中的子宫内膜PR及三种周期特异性整合素。
一所学术教学医院。
175例来自月经周期规律但有黄体期缺陷(LPD;第1组;n = 80)、药物治疗LPD(第2组;n = 16)、αvβ3表达异常的轻度和中度子宫内膜异位症(第3组;n = 21)、可育对照(第4组;n = 26)及不育对照(第5组;n = 32)的女性的子宫内膜活检组织。
使用半定量分级系统(HSCORE)对每种抗原进行免疫组化染色强度分析,采用方差分析并进行谢费校正。
在研究的五组中,组织学延迟≥3天且符合黄体期缺陷(LPD;第1组)的组织样本中,腺上皮细胞的核PR表达显著升高。PR下调失败与αvβ3整合素表达异常有关。LPD的药物治疗与子宫内膜组织学恢复正常、整合素表达正常以及上皮PR消失有关,与对照组相似。其他两种周期依赖性整合素标志物α1β1和α4β1在各组之间无差异。在αvβ3异常且子宫内膜“同步”的女性中,上皮PR表达与对照组无差异。
正常子宫内膜容受性的建立似乎与上皮PR的下调密切相关。与LPD一致的组织学延迟与PR下调失败及缺乏正常的子宫内膜容受性标志物有关。隐匿性子宫容受性缺陷(正常组织学中β3表达异常)的调节方式不同,提示存在影响子宫内膜容受性的其他机制。