Suppr超能文献

Wallstent自膨式金属支架输尿管植入的实验研究

Experimental study of Wallstent self-expandable metal stent in ureteral implantation.

作者信息

Desgrandchamps F, Tuchschmid Y, Cochand-Priollet B, Therin M, Teillac P, Le Duc A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1995 Dec;9(6):477-81. doi: 10.1089/end.1995.9.477.

Abstract

In regard to the risk of stent obstruction, there are persistent controversies concerning the use of the Wallstent self-expandable metal stents in the ureter. Only a few clinical trials have been published to date, and, from a technical point of view, no success predictors have been identified. In an experimental study using a pig model, we have shown that neither the length of the stent (5 or 10 cm) nor an initial 1-month intubation had any influence on the outcome of the stents. Among the eight implantations studied (four 5-cm and four 10-cm stents), only one 5-cm stent was perfectly patent at 35 days. In all the remaining stents, after 35 or 90 days, constant failure was related to distal narrowing at the edge of the stent, with no difference between the 5- and 10-cm stents or between the intubated and the nonintubated stents. This distal narrowing, probably attributable to a functional discrepancy between an adynamic stented ureter and a normal underlying ureter, demands extreme caution in human applications when the ureter is normally peristaltic.

摘要

关于支架阻塞的风险,在输尿管中使用Wallstent自膨式金属支架仍存在持续争议。迄今为止,仅有少数临床试验发表,并且从技术角度来看,尚未确定成功的预测因素。在一项使用猪模型的实验研究中,我们发现支架的长度(5或10厘米)以及最初1个月的插管对支架的结果均无影响。在所研究的8次植入中(4个5厘米和4个10厘米的支架),仅1个5厘米的支架在35天时完全通畅。在所有其余的支架中,35天或90天后,持续的失败均与支架边缘的远端狭窄有关,5厘米和10厘米的支架之间以及插管和未插管的支架之间均无差异。这种远端狭窄可能归因于无动力的带支架输尿管与正常的下层输尿管之间的功能差异,当输尿管正常蠕动时,在人体应用中需要格外谨慎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验