Joensen E, Lund Y, Richardt C
Scand J Psychol. 1977;18(2):153-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00270.x.
Bannister and Fransella's Grid Test of Schizophrenic Thought Disorder based on Personal Construct Theory and the concept of "loosened construing", as measurable in the scores of Intensity and Consistency between intercorrelations, has been applied to a Scandinavian sample of psychiatric patients. The validity of the test was illustrated, and a significant difference was found between a group of schizophrenics and schizophrenic borderline states and a group without schizophrenic thought disorders. The Grid Test scores were found to agree with thought disorder manifestations as evaluated in qualitative terms on the basis of cognitive and projective tests, but they did not differentiate between developmental levels of thinking corresponding to concreteness in organic impairment versus diffuseness in schizophrenia. Thus, the concept of "loosened construing" as applied in this thought disorder test seems too unspecific.
基于个人建构理论以及“建构松散”概念的班尼斯特和弗兰塞拉的精神分裂症思维障碍网格测试，可通过相互关联之间的强度和一致性得分来衡量，该测试已应用于一组斯堪的纳维亚精神病患者样本。测试的有效性得到了证明，并且在一组精神分裂症患者和精神分裂症边缘状态患者与一组无精神分裂症思维障碍的患者之间发现了显著差异。研究发现，网格测试得分与基于认知和投射测试从质的方面评估的思维障碍表现相符，但它们无法区分与器质性损害中的具体性相对应的思维发展水平和精神分裂症中的弥散性思维发展水平。因此，在这种思维障碍测试中应用的“建构松散”概念似乎过于不具体。
