• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苯丙胺和左旋多巴对丁苯那嗪诱导的大鼠颅内自我刺激抑制的影响。

The effect of amphetamine and L-dopa on tetrabenazine-induced suppression of intracranial self-stimulation in the rat.

作者信息

Carlsson S G, Ahlenius S

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 1977;18(2):157-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00271.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00271.x
PMID:877521
Abstract

The administration of d-amphetamine sulphate resulted in a restoration of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) suppressed by tetrabenazine (TBZ). A dose-dependent increase in the rate of ICSS was seen after L-dopa in animals pretreated with TBZ. d-Amhetamine is believed to act by facilitating the nerve-impulse induced release of central catecholamines (CA) whereas the blockage of the granular uptake-storage mechanism by TBZ will prevent the storage of CA formed from the administrated L-dopa and thereby interfere with their release by nerve-impulses. Thus, in the latter case, an activation of central CA receptors in all probability will be due to a dose-dependent diffusion of CA from nerve terminals. It is suggested that the failure to completely antagonize the TBZ-induced suppression of behaviour by L-dopa is due to the fact that a direct activation, independent of the nerve-impulse flow, of central CA receptors easily results in an overstimulation and a reduced specificity in behaviour.

摘要

给予硫酸右旋苯丙胺可使被丁苯那嗪(TBZ)抑制的颅内自我刺激(ICSS)恢复。在经TBZ预处理的动物中,左旋多巴给药后ICSS速率呈剂量依赖性增加。据信,右旋苯丙胺的作用是促进神经冲动诱导的中枢儿茶酚胺(CA)释放,而TBZ对颗粒摄取-储存机制的阻断会阻止由给药的左旋多巴形成的CA的储存,从而干扰其通过神经冲动的释放。因此,在后一种情况下,中枢CA受体的激活很可能是由于CA从神经末梢的剂量依赖性扩散。有人提出,左旋多巴未能完全拮抗TBZ诱导的行为抑制,是因为中枢CA受体的直接激活(独立于神经冲动流)很容易导致过度刺激和行为特异性降低。

相似文献

1
The effect of amphetamine and L-dopa on tetrabenazine-induced suppression of intracranial self-stimulation in the rat.苯丙胺和左旋多巴对丁苯那嗪诱导的大鼠颅内自我刺激抑制的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 1977;18(2):157-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00271.x.
2
Catecholamines and self-stimulation: the action of amantadine and its interaction with amphetamine.儿茶酚胺与自我刺激:金刚烷胺的作用及其与苯丙胺的相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1975 Mar-Apr;3(2):263-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(75)90156-2.
3
Comparative effects of amphetamine, scopolamine and chlordiazepoxide on self-stimulation behavior.
Rev Can Biol. 1972;31:Suppl:25-47.
4
Effects of low and high doses of L-dopa on the tetrabenazine or alpha-methyltyrosine-induced suppression of behaviour in a successive discrimination task.低剂量和高剂量左旋多巴对丁苯那嗪或α-甲基酪氨酸在连续辨别任务中诱导的行为抑制的影响。
Psychopharmacologia. 1974;39(3):199-212. doi: 10.1007/BF00421027.
5
Alteration in L-DOPA evoked dopamine and DOPAC output under conditions of impaired vesicular dopamine storage.在囊泡多巴胺储存受损的情况下,左旋多巴诱发的多巴胺和3,4-二羟基苯乙酸输出的改变。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 1998;105(10-12):1091-101. doi: 10.1007/s007020050114.
6
Stimulant properties of bromocriptine on central dopamine receptors in comparison to apomorphine, (+)-amphetamine and L-DOPA.与阿扑吗啡、(+)-苯丙胺和左旋多巴相比,溴隐亭对中枢多巴胺受体的兴奋特性。
Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Jan;56(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb06959.x.
7
Differential effects of amphetamine isomers on SN self-stimulation: evidence for DA neuron subtypes.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 May;18(5):747-51. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90018-7.
8
Actions and interactions of amphetamine on self-stimulation in rats.苯丙胺对大鼠自我刺激的作用及相互作用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1979 Sep;11(3):351-4. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(79)90148-5.
9
Differences between (+)- and (-)-amphetamine in effects on locomotor activity and L-dopa potentiating action in mice.(+)-和(-)-苯丙胺对小鼠运动活性及左旋多巴增强作用的影响差异
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1975;287(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00510448.
10
Effects of tetrabenazine on methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity in mice are dependent on order and time-course of administration.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997 Jan;56(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00123-2.