Mittal S, Kumar S, Roy K K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Feb;36(1):49-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02922.x.
We report a series of 45 patients with misplaced intrauterine devices (30 extrauterine and 15 intrauterine). Only those patients with intrauterine misplacements in whom conventional blind removal was not possible were included in the study. All of the 15 misplaced intrauterine devices could be removed hysteroscopically; 22 of the 30 extrauterine misplaced devices (73%) could be removed laparoscopically. One patient required both laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Only 7 (15.5%) of 45 patients required laparotomy for safe removal of misplaced devices. Considerable comfort and minimal hospital stay associated with endoscopic procedures should offer these as the first line attempt to remove a misplaced intrauterine or extrauterine translocated device.
我们报告了一组45例宫内节育器位置异常的患者(30例位于子宫外,15例位于子宫内)。本研究仅纳入那些无法通过传统盲目取出方法取出子宫内位置异常节育器的患者。15例子宫内位置异常的节育器均能通过宫腔镜取出;30例子宫外位置异常的节育器中有22例(73%)能通过腹腔镜取出。1例患者需要同时进行腹腔镜和宫腔镜检查。45例患者中只有7例(15.5%)需要开腹手术以安全取出位置异常的节育器。与内镜手术相关的显著舒适度和最短住院时间应使其成为取出子宫内或子宫外移位节育器的首选尝试方法。