Suppr超能文献

都柏林事故与急救科医生及护士对当地全科医生所提供服务的态度。

Attitudes of Dublin accident and emergency department doctors and nurses towards the services offered by local general practitioners.

作者信息

Gibney D, Murphy A W, Smith M, Bury G, Plunkett P K

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Accid Emerg Med. 1995 Dec;12(4):262-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.12.4.262.

Abstract

Good communication at the accident and emergency (A&E)-general practice interface is important. Such communication will be affected by the attitudes of A&E staff towards local general practitioners (GPs). The objectives of this study were to establish and compare, using a questionnaire, the attitudes of Dublin A&E doctors and nurses towards the services offered by local GPs. A questionnaire was sent to all nurses and non-consultant doctors working in four of the six Dublin A&E departments. Completed questionnaires were received from 57 (61%) nurses and 35 (81%) doctors. Only two activities (being accessible to patients during normal surgery hours and providing family planning services) were rated by more than one-fifth of doctors and nurses as being performed 'well'. Six activities (being accessible to patients outside surgery hours, providing long-term care for the chronically ill and debilitated, providing appropriate care for 'difficult' patients, advising patients about the appropriate use of services and performing first aid) were rated by more than 40% of both doctors and nurses as being performed 'badly'. For all activities the nurses consistently rated the performance of the 'average GP' more critically than the doctors. These results must be interpreted cautiously. The implications of these findings and how best they can be addressed are discussed.

摘要

在事故与急救(A&E)部门与全科医疗之间保持良好沟通非常重要。这种沟通会受到A&E部门工作人员对当地全科医生(GPs)态度的影响。本研究的目的是通过问卷调查来确定并比较都柏林A&E部门的医生和护士对当地GPs所提供服务的态度。向都柏林六个A&E部门中的四个部门的所有护士和非顾问医生发放了问卷。收到了57名(61%)护士和35名(81%)医生填写完整的问卷。只有两项活动(在正常手术时间方便患者就诊和提供计划生育服务)被超过五分之一的医生和护士评为“做得好”。六项活动(在手术时间以外方便患者就诊、为慢性病患者和体弱患者提供长期护理、为“难对付”的患者提供适当护理、就服务的适当使用向患者提供建议以及进行急救)被超过40%的医生和护士评为“做得差”。对于所有活动,护士对“普通全科医生”表现的评价始终比医生更为苛刻。这些结果必须谨慎解读。本文讨论了这些发现的意义以及如何最好地应对这些问题。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Why patients come to a casualty department.
Lancet. 1962 Feb 17;1(7225):369-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(62)91319-3.
5
The doctor-nurse game.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967 Jun;16(6):699-703. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730240055009.
6
Accident and emergency departments--why people attend with minor injuries and ailments.
Public Health. 1986 Jan;100(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(86)80081-6.
7
The use of the accident and emergency department.急诊部的使用情况。
Arch Emerg Med. 1987 Jun;4(2):77-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.4.2.77.
8
Accident and emergency abusers.急诊滥用者。
Practitioner. 1989 May 8;233(1468):657-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验