Ikonomidou C, Turski L
Department of Pediatric Neurology, University Clinic Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
Metab Brain Dis. 1996 Jun;11(2):125-41. doi: 10.1007/BF02069500.
The mechanisms of neuronal degeneration following traumatic head injury are not well understood and no adequate treatment is currently available for the prevention of traumatic brain damage in humans. Seven day old rat pups were subjected to mechanical percussion of the head. Cortical damage in infant rats was reduced by pre-treatment with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists dizocilpine (MK-801) or 3-((+/-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-I-phosphonate (CPP). The AMPA antagonist 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoyl-benzo (f) quinoxaline (NBQX) did not significantly suppress cortical damage in infant rats. In adult rats, traumatic head injury leads to primary (at impact-cortex) and secondary (distant-hippocampus) damage to the brain. Morphometric analysis demonstrated that both cortical and hippocampal damage was mitigated by pre-treatment with either the NMDA antagonist CPP or the non-NMDA antagonist NBQX. Neither treatment prevented primary damage in the cortex when therapy was started after trauma. Delayed treatment of rats with NBQX, but not with CPP, beginning between 1 and 7 h after trauma prevented the hippocampal damage. No protection was seen when therapy with NBQX was started 10 h after trauma. These data indicate that NMDA antagonists may possess better neuroprotective properties against excitotoxic processes triggered by traumatic brain injury in young individuals whereas AMPA antagonists may be more beneficial in adults.
创伤性脑损伤后神经元变性的机制尚未完全明确,目前尚无足够有效的治疗方法来预防人类的创伤性脑损伤。对7日龄的幼鼠进行头部机械撞击。用N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂地佐环平(MK-801)或3-((±)-2-羧基哌嗪-4-基)-丙基-1-膦酸(CPP)预处理可减轻幼鼠的皮质损伤。α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)拮抗剂2,3-二羟基-6-硝基-7-氨磺酰基苯并[f]喹喔啉(NBQX)并不能显著抑制幼鼠的皮质损伤。在成年大鼠中,创伤性脑损伤会导致大脑的原发性(撞击时的皮质)和继发性(远处的海马体)损伤。形态学分析表明,用NMDA拮抗剂CPP或非NMDA拮抗剂NBQX预处理均可减轻皮质和海马体的损伤。当创伤后开始治疗时,两种治疗方法均不能预防皮质的原发性损伤。创伤后1至7小时开始用NBQX而非CPP对大鼠进行延迟治疗可预防海马体损伤。创伤后10小时开始用NBQX治疗则未见保护作用。这些数据表明,NMDA拮抗剂可能对年轻个体创伤性脑损伤引发的兴奋性毒性过程具有更好的神经保护特性,而AMPA拮抗剂可能对成年个体更有益。