Ziegler R, Scheidt-Nave C, Leidig-Bruckner G
Department of Internal Medicine I (Endocrinology and Metabolism), University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Bone. 1996 Mar;18(3 Suppl):169S-177S. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00498-x.
Vertebral deformities may be caused by a variety of conditions, such as osteoporosis, severe trauma, congenital deformities, Scheuermann's disease, osteoarthritis, and multiple myeloma. For the individual patient, the correct diagnosis of an osteoporotic fracture is a prerequisite for the choice of optimal treatment and will be ensured by careful differential diagnosis based on a spinal radiograph and additional diagnostic procedures. Evaluation of radiographs by experienced radiologists is crucial for the correct diagnosis of vertebral fractures. For clinical trials and epidemiological studies of osteoporosis, qualitative radiological evaluation of radiographs has proven to be insufficient, since results lack reproducibility. Therefore, objective morphometric methods based on vertebral height measurements have been developed for fracture identification and quantification in scientific settings. Satisfactory sensitivity of these methods is usually reached at the expense of specificity, leading to a high number of false positives. With some differences in methodology, most of the morphometric approaches are of comparable validity. However, none of the morphometric methods allows any subclassification of vertebral deformities with respect to etiology. A combined approach based on morphometry as well as standardized radiological evaluation by experts appears to be the most promising solution to the problem. Further efforts are needed to standardize radiological criteria to yield comparable results between individual readers and different studies. It has to be evaluated whether the combined approach (clinical reading and morphometry) is necessary during follow-up evaluation, as morphometry may be sufficient for monitoring once the diagnosis has been established at baseline.
椎体畸形可能由多种情况引起,如骨质疏松症、严重创伤、先天性畸形、休门氏病、骨关节炎和多发性骨髓瘤。对于个体患者而言,正确诊断骨质疏松性骨折是选择最佳治疗方法的前提,通过基于脊柱X光片及其他诊断程序的仔细鉴别诊断可确保做到这一点。经验丰富的放射科医生对X光片进行评估对于正确诊断椎体骨折至关重要。对于骨质疏松症的临床试验和流行病学研究,X光片的定性放射学评估已被证明是不够的,因为结果缺乏可重复性。因此,基于椎体高度测量的客观形态计量学方法已被开发出来,用于科学研究中的骨折识别和量化。这些方法通常以牺牲特异性为代价来达到令人满意的敏感性,从而导致大量假阳性结果。尽管在方法上存在一些差异,但大多数形态计量学方法的有效性相当。然而,没有一种形态计量学方法能够根据病因对椎体畸形进行任何亚分类。基于形态计量学以及专家进行的标准化放射学评估的联合方法似乎是解决该问题最有前景的方案。需要进一步努力使放射学标准标准化,以便在个体读者和不同研究之间产生可比的结果。必须评估在随访评估期间联合方法(临床读片和形态计量学)是否必要,因为一旦在基线时确立了诊断,形态计量学可能足以进行监测。