• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多位阅片者ROC曲线的统计学比较。

Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.

作者信息

Swaving M, van Houwelingen H, Ottes F P, Steerneman T

机构信息

BAZIS, Experimental Developments, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):143-52. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600206.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9601600206
PMID:8778532
Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is the commonly accepted method for comparing diagnostic imaging systems. In general, ROC studies are designed in such a way that multiple readers read the same images and each image is presented by means of two different imaging systems. Statistical methods for the comparison of the ROC curves from one reader have been developed, but extension of these methods to multiple readers is not straightforward. A new method of analysis is presented for the comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers. This method includes a non-parametric estimation of the variances and covariances between the various areas under the curves. The method described is more appropriate than the paired t test, because it also takes the case-sample variation into account.

摘要

受试者操作特征(ROC)分析是比较诊断成像系统的普遍认可方法。一般来说,ROC研究的设计方式是让多个阅片者阅读相同的图像,且每张图像通过两种不同的成像系统呈现。已开发出用于比较来自单个阅片者的ROC曲线的统计方法,但将这些方法扩展到多个阅片者并非易事。本文提出了一种新的分析方法,用于比较来自多个阅片者的ROC曲线。该方法包括对曲线下各个区域之间的方差和协方差进行非参数估计。所描述的方法比配对t检验更合适,因为它还考虑了病例样本的变异性。

相似文献

1
Statistical comparison of ROC curves from multiple readers.多位阅片者ROC曲线的统计学比较。
Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):143-52. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600206.
2
Binary and multi-category ratings in a laboratory observer performance study: a comparison.实验室观察者绩效研究中的二元和多类别评级:一项比较
Med Phys. 2008 Oct;35(10):4404-9. doi: 10.1118/1.2977766.
3
Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.乳腺钼靶筛查中观察者性能实验室研究的预期效用与ROC曲线下面积的比较统计特性。
Acad Radiol. 2014 Apr;21(4):481-90. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.12.011.
4
Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.乳腺钼靶检查中读者的变异性及其对读者群体和病例预期效用的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):561-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04271043.
5
Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.乳腺病变的检测与分类:屏-片乳腺摄影与软读片全视野数字化乳腺摄影的比较——观察者性能研究
Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371041605. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
6
Simultaneous inference for factorial multireader diagnostic trials.析因多读者诊断试验的同时推断
Stat Med. 2018 Jan 15;37(1):28-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.7507. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
Is an ROC-type response truly always better than a binary response in observer performance studies?在观察者性能研究中,ROC 型反应真的总是优于二项反应吗?
Acad Radiol. 2010 May;17(5):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
8
A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.用于多读者研究中比较ROC曲线的置换检验——一种多读者ROC置换检验
Acad Radiol. 2006 Apr;13(4):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.12.012.
9
Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.独立双人阅片与计算机辅助诊断(CAD)在乳腺钙化诊断中的比较。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan;13(1):84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.09.086.
10
Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography.数字乳腺摄影中临床图像处理算法的评估
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):765-75. doi: 10.1118/1.3077121.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic value of C reactive protein in infections of the lower respiratory tract: systematic review.C反应蛋白在下呼吸道感染中的诊断价值:系统评价
BMJ. 2005 Jul 2;331(7507):26. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38483.478183.EB. Epub 2005 Jun 24.