Flessner M F, Schwab A
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, New York 14620, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1996 Feb;270(2 Pt 2):F377-90. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1996.270.2.F377.
Ascites or dialysis fluid in the peritoneal cavity causes fluid loss from the cavity to the body. Experiments in animals and in humans have shown that the fluid loss rate increases with large increments in the intraperitoneal hydrostatic pressure (Pip). We hypothesized that there is a low-threshold Pip above which this fluid loss occurs. Because the full Pip force is exerted across the abdominal wall (AW), we further hypothesized that fluid movement into the abdominal wall would vary directly with the Pip. To address these questions, we dialyzed rats for 3 h in the supine position at constant levels of Pip with isotonic and hypertonic dialysis solutions containing a protein marker of fluid movement. We measured total fluid loss, AW fluid-marker concentration, and lymph flow. With variation of Pip from 0 to 8 cmH2O, we found that 1) lymph flows (0.61 +/- 0.03 ml/h) were not dependent on Pip, 2) measured isotonic fluid loss rate varied from 0.29 +/- 0.06 ml/h at 0 cmH2O to 0.62 +/- 0.02 at 2 cmH2O and then rose in a linear fashion to 5.06 +/- 0.10 ml/h at 8 cmH2O, 3) fluid movement into the AW paralleled the measured fluid loss rate, and 4) protein clearance from the cavity overestimated the true fluid loss because of adsorption of the marker to the peritoneal surface. We conclude that, although peritoneal lymph flow is not dependent on intraperitoneal hydrostatic or osmotic pressure, fluid loss from the cavity and fluid loss to the abdominal wall are directly proportional to Pip > 2 cmH2O. We also note that protein markers of fluid movement require correction for tissue surface adsorption for accurate results.
腹腔内的腹水或透析液会导致液体从腹腔流失至身体其他部位。动物实验和人体实验均表明,随着腹腔内静水压(Pip)大幅升高,液体流失速率会增加。我们推测存在一个低阈值的Pip,当超过此阈值时就会发生这种液体流失。由于Pip的全部作用力是通过腹壁(AW)施加的,我们进一步推测液体向腹壁的移动将与Pip直接相关。为解决这些问题,我们让大鼠仰卧位,使用含有液体移动蛋白标记物的等渗和高渗透析液,在恒定的Pip水平下进行3小时的透析。我们测量了总液体流失量、腹壁液体标记物浓度和淋巴流量。随着Pip从0变化至8 cmH₂O,我们发现:1)淋巴流量(0.61±0.03 ml/h)不依赖于Pip;2)测得的等渗液体流失速率在0 cmH₂O时为0.29±0.06 ml/h,在2 cmH₂O时为0.62±0.02 ml/h,然后呈线性上升,在8 cmH₂O时达到5.06±0.10 ml/h;3)液体向腹壁的移动与测得的液体流失速率平行;4)由于标记物吸附到腹膜表面,从腹腔清除的蛋白质高估了实际液体流失量。我们得出结论,尽管腹膜淋巴流量不依赖于腹腔内静水压或渗透压,但当Pip>2 cmH₂O时,腹腔内液体流失和向腹壁的液体流失与Pip成正比。我们还注意到,为获得准确结果,液体移动的蛋白质标记物需要针对组织表面吸附进行校正。