Valentine R J, Myers S I, Hagino R T, Clagett G P
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Tex., USA.
Stroke. 1996 Sep;27(9):1502-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1502.
The durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in young adults with premature carotid atherosclerosis has not been adequately assessed. This study examined the late recurrence and mortality rates in young adults undergoing CEA.
We studied 42 young patients (mean age, 45.5 +/- 0.5 years) who underwent CEA and compared them with 110 older control subjects (mean age, 65.8 +/- 0.4 years) undergoing CEA during the same period. Data were collected regarding demographics, operative indications, follow-up carotid duplex studies, recurrent symptoms, and deaths.
Demographics and atherosclerotic risk factors were similar between the two groups. During a mean follow-up of 57.9 +/- 6.0 months, 10 (24%) young patients and 3 (3%) control subjects developed significant, recurrent ipsilateral stenoses (> or = 50% diameter loss) (P < .001). Six (14%) young patients and 1 control subject had recurrent ipsilateral symptoms (P = .002). Nine (21%) young patients and 26 (24%) older control subjects required contralateral CEA; 8 (18%) young patients and 18 (16%) older control subjects underwent lower extremity revascularization procedures. Cumulative 5-year survival by life-table analysis was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.95) for study patients and was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.77) for control subjects (P = .06).
These data demonstrate a trend toward more favorable survival in young versus older patients after CEA; however, survival differences did not achieve statistical significance. Young patients are far more likely to develop recurrent symptoms and recurrent carotid stenoses than older counterparts. Close follow-up with serial duplex ultrasound may be important in young patients after CEA.
对于患有早发性颈动脉粥样硬化的年轻成年人,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的耐久性尚未得到充分评估。本研究调查了接受CEA的年轻成年人的晚期复发率和死亡率。
我们研究了42例接受CEA的年轻患者(平均年龄45.5±0.5岁),并将他们与同期接受CEA的110例老年对照者(平均年龄65.8±0.4岁)进行比较。收集了有关人口统计学、手术指征、随访颈动脉双功超声检查、复发症状和死亡的数据。
两组之间的人口统计学和动脉粥样硬化危险因素相似。在平均57.9±6.0个月的随访期间,10例(24%)年轻患者和3例(3%)对照者出现了明显的同侧复发性狭窄(直径损失≥50%)(P<0.001)。6例(14%)年轻患者和1例对照者有同侧复发性症状(P = 0.002)。9例(21%)年轻患者和26例(24%)老年对照者需要进行对侧CEA;8例(18%)年轻患者和18例(16%)老年对照者接受了下肢血管重建手术。通过生命表分析,研究患者的累积5年生存率为0.83(95%置信区间[CI],0.71至0.95),对照者为0.67(95%CI,0.58至0.77)(P = 0.06)。
这些数据表明,CEA后年轻患者的生存趋势比老年患者更有利;然而,生存差异未达到统计学意义。年轻患者比老年患者更容易出现复发症状和复发性颈动脉狭窄。CEA术后对年轻患者进行连续双功超声密切随访可能很重要。