Suppr超能文献

脑卒中的联合神经保护与再灌注治疗。鲁贝唑和双阿司匹林交联血红蛋白在实验性局灶性缺血中的作用。

Combined neuroprotection and reperfusion therapy for stroke. Effect of lubeluzole and diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin in experimental focal ischemia.

作者信息

Aronowski J, Strong R, Grotta J C

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 1996 Sep;27(9):1571-6; discussion 1576-7. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.9.1571.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In search of a better treatment for acute ischemic stroke, we evaluated the use of lubeluzole and hemodilution with diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) therapy to test whether treatment with two complementary acting compounds provides more potent protection than either treatment alone.

METHODS

We used unilateral reversible middle cerebral artery (MCA) and common carotid artery (CCA) occlusion of various durations in Long-Evans rats to produce ischemic cortical lesions. We calculated the average maximal lesion volume (Volmax) and the time required to produce half maximal lesion size (T50) in control animals (n = 31) and evaluated the effects on cerebral perfusion and infarct size of treatment with lubeluzole (n = 23), hemodilution (to 30% hematocrit) with albumin (n = 17) or DCLHb (n = 23), and combined lubeluzole + DCLHb therapy initiated 15 minutes after MCA/CCA occlusion.

RESULTS

The Volmax produced by MCA/CCA occlusion in control animals was 138.5 +/- 7.7 mm3, and T50 was 98.5 +/- 10.2 minutes. Lubeluzole alone reduced Volmax by 53% with no significant effect on T50. In contrast to lubeluzole, DCLHb hemodilution prolonged T50 by 68% with no significant effect on Volmax. Prolongation of T50 by DCLHb was not due to hemodilution itself, since a similar degree of hemodilution with albumin had no effect. Finally, combined lubeluzole+DCLHb rescued 72% of the tissue and augmented the effect of lubeluzole alone by 40% (Volmax, 66.3 +/- 13.0 versus 39.4 +/- 12.2 mm3) while prolonging T50 by 31%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy for acute stroke using compounds with complementary action can result in more complete attenuation of neuronal damage and demonstrates the possible clinical utility of combined neuroprotective and reperfusion therapies.

摘要

背景与目的

为寻求急性缺血性卒中的更佳治疗方法,我们评估了鲁贝唑的应用以及用双阿司匹林交联血红蛋白(DCLHb)进行血液稀释疗法,以检验两种具有互补作用的化合物联合治疗是否比单独使用任一治疗方法能提供更强有力的保护作用。

方法

我们采用不同时长的单侧可逆性大脑中动脉(MCA)和颈总动脉(CCA)闭塞法,在Long-Evans大鼠中制造缺血性皮质损伤。我们计算了对照动物(n = 31)的平均最大损伤体积(Volmax)以及产生半数最大损伤大小所需的时间(T50),并评估了鲁贝唑治疗(n = 23)、用白蛋白进行血液稀释(使血细胞比容降至30%,n = 17)或DCLHb治疗(n = 23)以及在MCA/CCA闭塞15分钟后开始的鲁贝唑+DCLHb联合治疗对脑灌注和梗死灶大小的影响。

结果

对照动物中MCA/CCA闭塞产生的Volmax为138.5±7.7立方毫米,T50为98.5±10.2分钟。单独使用鲁贝唑可使Volmax降低53%,对T50无显著影响。与鲁贝唑不同,DCLHb血液稀释使T50延长了68%,对Volmax无显著影响。DCLHb对T50的延长并非由于血液稀释本身,因为用白蛋白进行类似程度的血液稀释并无效果。最后,鲁贝唑+DCLHb联合治疗挽救了72%的组织,使单独使用鲁贝唑的效果增强了40%(Volmax,66.3±13.0立方毫米对39.4±12.2立方毫米),同时使T50延长了31%。

结论

使用具有互补作用的化合物进行急性卒中联合治疗可更完全地减轻神经元损伤,并证明了联合神经保护和再灌注疗法可能具有的临床实用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验