Suppr超能文献

现有及新型抗癫痫药物的疗效与不良反应。

Efficacy and adverse effects of established and new antiepileptic drugs.

作者信息

Mattson R H

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 1995;36 Suppl 2:S13-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb05995.x.

Abstract

Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEDs. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No "drug of choice" can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.

摘要

抗癫痫药物(AED)的选择主要基于对特定癫痫发作类型和癫痫综合征的疗效。然而,不同的AEDs疗效往往相似,其他特性如不良反应、药代动力学特性和成本也可能很重要。对于伴有失神发作、强直-阵挛发作和肌阵挛发作的特发性全身性癫痫,首选的AED是丙戊酸盐(VPA)。伴有强直发作、失张力发作和其他发作类型的继发性全身性癫痫,单用任何一种AED或联合使用AEDs都难以治疗。失神发作的首选AED是乙琥胺(ESM)和VPA。对于控制原发性全身性强直-阵挛发作,任何一种其他主要的AED都可能有效。如果不能使用VPA,卡马西平(CBZ)、苯巴比妥(PB)、苯妥英(PHT)或扑米酮(PRM)可能有效,但必须加用ESM或苯二氮䓬类药物(BZD)来控制相关的失神或肌阵挛发作。伴有部分性发作和继发性全身性强直-阵挛发作的部分性癫痫,首选的AED是CBZ和PHT。越来越多的证据表明,当CBZ和PHT无效时,VPA是一个很好的替代选择。由于不良反应,PB和PRM是次选药物。治疗难治性癫痫发作可能需要联合使用五种标准AEDs中的两种,但尚无研究表明哪种联合用药是最佳组合。其他癫痫综合征,如新生儿和婴儿癫痫、热性癫痫、酒精性癫痫和癫痫持续状态,需要特定的AED治疗。最终,AED的选择必须个体化。不能为所有患者指定“首选药物”。在做出选择之前,必须权衡癫痫发作类型的预期疗效、预期不良反应的重要性、药代动力学以及AEDs的成本,并与患者进行讨论。一些具有独特作用机制、药代动力学特性且不良反应较少的新型AEDs,有望显著改善癫痫治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验