Chen Baibing, Choi Hyunmi, Hirsch Lawrence J, Katz Austen, Legge Alexander, Buchsbaum Richard, Detyniecki Kamil
Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Dept. of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; William Beaumont School of Medicine, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Dept. of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Nov;76:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
PURPOSE: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are common, undesirable effects associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) use. The objective of the study was to compare the PBSE profiles of older and newer AEDs in a large specialty practice-based sample of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. METHODS: As part of the Columbia and Yale AED Database Project, we reviewed patient records including demographics, medical history, AED use, and side effects for 4085 adult patients (age: 18 years) newly started on an AED regimen. Psychiatric and behavioral side effects were determined by patient or physician report in the medical record, which included depressive mood, psychosis, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, irritability, aggression, and tantrum. Significant non-AED predictors of PBSE rate were first determined from 83 variables using logistic regression. Predictors were then controlled for in the comparison analysis of the rate of PBSEs and intolerable PBSEs (PBSEs that led to dosage reduction or discontinuation) between 18 AEDs. RESULTS: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occurred in 17.2% of patients and led to intolerability in 13.8% of patients. History of psychiatric condition(s), secondary generalized seizures, absence seizures, and intractable epilepsy were associated with increased incidence of PBSE. Levetiracetam (LEV) had the greatest PBSE rate (22.1%). This was statistically significant when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs (P<0.001, OR=6.87). Levetiracetam was also significantly (P<0.001) associated with higher intolerability rate (17.7%), dose decreased rate (9.4%), and complete cessation rate (8.3%), when compared with the aggregate of the other AEDs. Zonisamide (ZNS) was also significantly associated with a higher rate of PBSE (9.7%) and IPBSE (7.9%, all P<0.001). On the other hand, carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenytoin (PHT), and valproate (VPA) were significantly associated with a decreased PBSE rates (P<0.001). Carbamazepine, GBP, LTG, PHT, and VPA were also associated with lower IPBSE rates when compared individually with the aggregate of other AEDs. All other AEDs were found to have intermediate rates that were not either increased or decreased compared with other AEDs. When each AED was compared to LTG, only CBZ had a significantly lower PBSE rate. The main limitations of this study were that the study design was retrospective and not blinded, and the AEDs were not randomly assigned to patients. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric and behavioral side effects occur more frequently in patients taking LEV and ZNS than any other AED and led to higher rates of intolerability. Lower PBSE rates were seen in patients taking CBZ, CLB, GBP, LTG, OXC, PHT, and VPA. Our findings may help facilitate the AED selection process.
目的:精神和行为副作用(PBSEs)是与使用抗癫痫药物(AED)相关的常见不良影响。本研究的目的是在一个基于大型专科实践的癫痫诊断患者样本中比较新旧AEDs的PBSEs特征。 方法:作为哥伦比亚和耶鲁AED数据库项目的一部分,我们回顾了4085例新开始使用AED治疗方案的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)的病历,包括人口统计学、病史、AED使用情况和副作用。精神和行为副作用由病历中的患者或医生报告确定,包括抑郁情绪、精神病、焦虑、自杀念头、易怒、攻击性和发脾气。首先使用逻辑回归从83个变量中确定PBSE发生率的重要非AED预测因素。然后在18种AEDs之间的PBSEs和无法耐受的PBSEs(导致剂量减少或停药的PBSEs)发生率的比较分析中对预测因素进行控制。 结果:17.2%的患者出现精神和行为副作用,13.8%的患者出现无法耐受的情况。精神疾病史、继发性全身性癫痫发作、失神发作和难治性癫痫与PBSE发生率增加相关。左乙拉西坦(LEV)的PBSE发生率最高(22.1%)。与其他AEDs的总和相比,这具有统计学意义(P<0.001,OR=6.87)。与其他AEDs的总和相比,左乙拉西坦也与更高的无法耐受率(17.7%)、剂量降低率(9.4%)和完全停药率(8.3%)显著相关(P<0.001)。唑尼沙胺(ZNS)也与更高的PBSE发生率(9.7%)和无法耐受的PBSE发生率(7.9%,所有P<0.001)显著相关。另一方面,卡马西平(CBZ)、氯巴占(CLB)、加巴喷丁(GBP)、拉莫三嗪(LTG)、奥卡西平(OXC)、苯妥英(PHT)和丙戊酸盐(VPA)与PBSE发生率降低显著相关(P<0.001)。与其他AEDs的总和单独比较时,卡马西平、GBP、LTG、PHT和VPA也与更低的无法耐受的PBSE发生率相关。发现所有其他AEDs的发生率处于中间水平,与其他AEDs相比既没有增加也没有降低。当将每种AED与LTG比较时,只有CBZ的PBSE发生率显著更低。本研究的主要局限性在于研究设计是回顾性的且未设盲,并且AEDs未随机分配给患者。 结论:服用LEV和ZNS的患者比服用任何其他AED的患者更频繁出现精神和行为副作用,并导致更高的无法耐受率。服用CBZ、CLB、GBP、LTG、OXC、PHT和VPA的患者PBSE发生率较低。我们的研究结果可能有助于促进AED的选择过程。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017-11
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017-5
Neurology. 2007-5-15
Neurology. 2008-11-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-11-7
Epilepsy Behav. 2015-1
Epilepsy Behav. 2025-9-1
Indian J Psychol Med. 2025-8-15
Int J Mol Sci. 2025-6-27
BJPsych Open. 2025-6-26
Epilepsy Curr. 2025-6-16
Case Rep Neurol Med. 2025-6-2