Sparer M S
Columbia University, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):433-60. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-433.
Nearly every state now encourages (or requires) its Medicaid beneficiaries to enroll in managed care. There is, however, extraordinary variation in every aspect of state managed care policy. In this article, I examine the managed care initiatives of two states, New York and California, and focus on variation in state policy-making environments and on the influence of such variation on efforts to protect the medical safety net. I conclude that California's managed care initiative is less decentralized and pluralistic than New York's, and that California has used its discretion to adopt a strategy designed in part to protect safety-net hospitals. I end with a plea for greater federal control of managed care initiatives, a policy proposal that is at odds with the current trend to increase state authority.
现在几乎每个州都鼓励(或要求)其医疗补助计划受益人参加管理式医疗。然而,州管理式医疗政策的各个方面存在极大差异。在本文中,我研究了纽约和加利福尼亚两个州的管理式医疗举措,重点关注州政策制定环境的差异以及这种差异对保护医疗安全网努力的影响。我得出的结论是,加利福尼亚州的管理式医疗举措不如纽约州那样分散和多元化,并且加利福尼亚州已自行决定采取一项部分旨在保护安全网医院的策略。我最后呼吁联邦政府对管理式医疗举措加强控制,这一政策提议与当前增强州权力的趋势背道而驰。