Radcliffe M J, Ashurst P, Brostoff J
Southampton University Hospitals Trust, England.
J R Soc Med. 1995 Dec;88(12):678-9.
Every doctor in clinical practice is familiar with the patient who presents with multiple 'soft' symptoms. Where organic pathology cannot be demonstrated, there is a tendency to apply psychiatric labels. Indeed, it has been suggested that the risk of psychiatric disorder increases linearly with the number of presented symptoms. In psychiatric practice, the mere absence of an organic cause of disease is often regarded as adequate reason to invoke a psychological mechanism. However, this action precludes the possibility of any other diagnosis, and thus constricts therapeutic management to the psychiatric realm. Such psychologization of illness is commonplace, overworked and infrequently challenged. This highlights the longstanding controversy over multiple allergy and the role of psychiatric disorder.
每位临床医生都熟悉那些表现出多种“软性”症状的患者。当无法证实存在器质性病变时,就倾向于贴上精神疾病的标签。实际上,有人提出精神障碍的风险会随着所呈现症状的数量呈线性增加。在精神科临床中,仅仅因为不存在器质性病因,往往就被视为足以推断存在心理机制的充分理由。然而,这种做法排除了其他任何诊断的可能性,从而将治疗管理局限于精神科领域。这种对疾病的心理化解释很常见,被过度使用且很少受到质疑。这凸显了关于多重过敏以及精神障碍作用的长期争议。