Lenz O, Schmid B, Kilter H, La Rosée K, Flesch M, Kuhn-Regnier F, Südkamp M, Böhm M
Klinik III für Innere Medizin der Universität zu Köln, Germany.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1995 Dec 27;294(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(95)00514-5.
Human myocardial angiotensin II receptors and the angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes were characterised using the partial angiotensin II receptor agonist [125I][Sar1,IIe8]angiotensin II and the selective antagonists losartan (2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxymethyl-1-[2'((1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphen yl-4-yl)- methyl]imidazole) and PD 123177 (1-[(4-amino-3-methylphenyl)methyl]-5-(diphenyl-acetyl)- 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazol[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid). The density of angiotensin II receptors was higher in atrial than in ventricular myocardium. Angiotensin AT2 receptors were predominant in atria and ventricles (80-85% of total angiotensin II receptors). Only in isolated, electrically driven atrial trabeculae but not in ventricular preparations, angiotensin II did produce a concentration-dependent positive inotropic effect, which was antagonized exclusively by the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and which amounted to about 20% of the positive inotropic effect of milrinone and isoprenaline. The application of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors captopril, enalaprilat and ramiprilat had no inotropic effect in either tissue. It is concluded that angiotensin AT1 receptors exclusively mediate direct positive inotropic effects in atrial myocardium. Since angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not produce any inotropic effect, tonic regulation of basal force of contraction by angiotensin II does not occur.
利用部分血管紧张素II受体激动剂[125I][Sar1,IIe8]血管紧张素II以及选择性拮抗剂氯沙坦(2-正丁基-4-氯-5-羟甲基-1-[2'((1H-四氮唑-5-基)联苯-4-基)-甲基]咪唑)和PD 123177(1-[(4-氨基-3-甲基苯基)甲基]-5-(二苯乙酰基)-4,5,6,7-四氢-1H-咪唑[4,5-c]吡啶-6-羧酸)对人心肌血管紧张素II受体以及血管紧张素AT1和AT2受体亚型进行了表征。心房肌中血管紧张素II受体的密度高于心室肌。血管紧张素AT2受体在心房和心室中占主导地位(占血管紧张素II受体总数的80-85%)。仅在分离的、电驱动的心房小梁中,而不是在心室标本中,血管紧张素II确实产生了浓度依赖性正性肌力作用,该作用仅被血管紧张素AT1受体拮抗剂氯沙坦拮抗,其强度约为米力农和异丙肾上腺素正性肌力作用的20%。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂卡托普利、依那普利拉和雷米普利拉在两种组织中均无正性肌力作用。结论是血管紧张素AT1受体仅介导心房肌的直接正性肌力作用。由于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不产生任何正性肌力作用,因此血管紧张素II对基础收缩力不存在紧张性调节。