• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost-effective management of chronic stable angina.

作者信息

O'Rourke R A

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio 8284-7872, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1996 Jun;19(6):497-501. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960190611.

DOI:10.1002/clc.4960190611
PMID:8790956
Abstract

In certain patients with stable angina who are at moderate to high risk, coronary bypass surgery or coronary angioplasty are the therapeutic options of choice. However, in selected other patients the use of anti-ischemic drug therapy and secondary prevention reduce episodes of myocardial ischemia and result in a good long-term prognosis. Factors affecting management include the extent of coronary disease, the magnitude of cardiac symptoms, the severity of myocardial ischemia and of left ventricular function. Based upon these and other clinical characteristics, patients can be divided into low-, moderate-, or high-risk categories for morbidity and mortality. Patients at high risk are more likely to be selected for myocardial revascularization and patients at low risk are often treated with medical therapy, at least initially. Based on the available cost-effectiveness data, medical therapy or coronary angioplasty are the preferred initial strategies for low-risk coronary disease, whereas coronary bypass surgery (CABG) is recommended for many high-risk patients, particularly for those with triple-vessel disease and impaired left ventricular function or ischemia at a low workload. CABG is cost-effective for patients with severe angina and left main coronary artery disease and also for patients with mild angina and triple-vessel disease. Coronary angioplasty is cost-effective for patients with severe angina, and single- or multivessel disease. In patients with lesser symptoms and mild coronary disease, the cost effectiveness of myocardial revascularization therapy is less likely to be as good as it is in patients with more extensive disease and severe symptoms.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cost-effective management of chronic stable angina.
Clin Cardiol. 1996 Jun;19(6):497-501. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960190611.
2
Management of chronic stable angina: medical therapy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Lessons from the randomized trials.慢性稳定型心绞痛的治疗:药物治疗、经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术和冠状动脉旁路移植手术。随机试验的经验教训。
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Feb 1;128(3):216-23. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-3-199802010-00008.
3
Effects of optimal medical treatment with or without coronary revascularization on angina and subsequent revascularizations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease.最佳药物治疗联合或不联合冠状动脉血运重建对 2 型糖尿病合并稳定型缺血性心脏病患者心绞痛及后续血运重建的影响。
Circulation. 2011 Apr 12;123(14):1492-500. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.978247. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
4
Myocardial revascularization for chronic stable angina. Analysis of the role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty based on data available in 1989.慢性稳定型心绞痛的心肌血运重建。基于1989年可得数据对经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术作用的分析。
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 1;113(11):852-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-11-852.
5
Is medical treatment for angina the most cost-effective option?
Eur Heart J. 1997 May;18 Suppl B:B35-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/18.suppl_b.35.
6
Revascularization trumps medicine for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic angina (or does it?).对于2型糖尿病合并慢性心绞痛患者,血管重建术优于药物治疗(真的如此吗?)
Circulation. 2011 Apr 12;123(14):1489-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.022780. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
7
[Economic evaluation of different treatment strategies in patients with stable angina pectoris or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia on basis of results from the Asymptomatic-Cardiac-Ischemia Pilot study (ACIP)].基于无症状性心肌缺血初步研究(ACIP)结果对稳定型心绞痛或无症状性心肌缺血患者不同治疗策略的经济学评估
Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Jan 15;95(1):1-13.
8
Can improved quality of care reduce the costs of managing angina pectoris?改善护理质量能否降低心绞痛的管理成本?
Eur Heart J. 1996 Mar;17 Suppl A:29-40. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/17.suppl_a.29.
9
Resource allocation for chronic stable angina: a systematic review of effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions.慢性稳定型心绞痛的资源分配:对替代干预措施的有效性、成本及成本效益的系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(10):i-iv, 1-176.
10
Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.冠状动脉疾病的血运重建治疗。冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1995;22(2):145-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential costs and effects of the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease in the UK.英国冠心病国家服务框架的潜在成本及影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(1):49-60. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321010-00004.