Suppr超能文献

Formula-derived prostate volume determination.

作者信息

Aarnink R G, de la Rosette J J, Debruyne F M, Wijkstra H

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1996;29(4):399-402. doi: 10.1159/000473786.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Despite disadvantages such as time-consuming and tedious to the user, planimetric volumetry is considered to be the most accurate method for prostate volume determination. This study investigates the possibilities of formula-derived volume determination and reveals the best alternative to planimetric volumetry.

METHODS

The prostate volume is calculated using prostatic dimensions (length, height and width) in four mathematical descriptions for prostate volume calculations. As reference, the planimetric results obtained with 4 mm step size were used.

RESULTS

Compared to the results of planimetric volumetry obtained with 4-mm intersection distance, the best results for volume determination with mathematical calculation were obtained with a formula describing a spheroid volume using half the mean of width, height and length as radius.

CONCLUSION

Although planimetric volumetry remains the most accurate method for prostate volume determination, the spheroid formula is the best alternative method for quick volume assessment with reasonable accuracy.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验