Zinn R A, Plascencia A
Department of Animal Science, Imperial Valley Agricultural Center, University of California, El Centro 92243, USA.
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1194-201. doi: 10.2527/1996.7461194x.
Ninety-six crossbred steers (316 kg) were used in a 135-d growth-performance trial to evaluate the comparative feeding value of yellow rease (0 vs 6%) in 10% forage vs 30% forage rowing-finishing diets. There were interactions between forage level and supplemental fat on ADG (P < 10), DM conversion (P < .05), diet NE (P < .10), longissimus muscle area (P < .01), fat thickness (P < 10), and percentage of retail yield (P < .01). Supplemental fat increased (8.5%; P < .10) marbling score, sufficient to move the average carcass grade from high Select to low Choice. With the low-forage diet supplemental fat did not affect (P > .10) ADG, but decreased (P < .01) retail yield (2.3%) and longissimus muscle area (5.6%). With the high-forage diet supplemental fat increased ADG (13.3%; P < .05) and longissimus muscle area (7.1%; P < .01) but did not affect (P > .10) retail yield. Differences in carcass fat were small and not affected by treatment (P > .10). The NEm and NEg values of yellow grease were 3.55 and 2.65 Mcal/kg, respectively, for the low-forage diet and 5.71 and 4.65 Mcal/kg, respectively, for the high-forage diet. Treatment effects on characteristics of ruminal and total tract digestion were evaluated using four Holstein steers (233 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. There were no interactions (P > .10) between forage level and supplemental fat on ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM, ADF, starch, lipid, and gross energy. Postruminal lipid digestibility averaged 65.5% and was not affected (P > .10) by forage level. The ME value of yellow grease was the same (6.94 Mcal/kg) for both the low- and high-forage diets. There was an interaction between supplemental fat and forage level on nonammonia N flow to the small intestine (P < .10), percentage of ruminal escape feed N (P < .05), postruminal N digestion (P < .05), and methane production (P < .10). With the low-forage diet, fat supplementation did not affect (P > .10) ruminal degradation for feed N and methane production. With the high-forage diet fat supplementation decreased ruminal degradation of feed N (19.0%; P < .05) and methane production (14.8%; P < .05). We concluded that supplementation of a 30% forage (alfalfa hay) finishing diet with 6% yellow grease will permit growth-performance similar to that of steers fed a 10% forage diet without supplemental fat. The improved performance may be attributed to increased diet energy density and positive associative effects on protein flow to the small intestine and decreased ruminal methane production.
选用96头杂交阉牛(体重316千克)进行为期135天的生长性能试验,以评估在10%粗饲料与30%粗饲料育肥日粮中添加6%黄色油脂的相对饲喂价值。粗饲料水平与补充脂肪对平均日增重(ADG,P<0.10)、干物质转化率(P<0.05)、日粮净能(P<0.10)、背最长肌面积(P<0.01)、脂肪厚度(P<0.10)和零售产量百分比(P<0.01)存在交互作用。补充脂肪使大理石花纹评分提高了8.5%(P<0.10),足以使平均胴体等级从高精选级升至低特选级。在低粗饲料日粮中,补充脂肪对ADG无影响(P>0.10),但零售产量降低了2.3%(P<0.01),背最长肌面积减少了5.6%(P<0.01)。在高粗饲料日粮中,补充脂肪使ADG提高了13.3%(P<0.05),背最长肌面积增加了7.1%(P<0.01),但对零售产量无影响(P>0.10)。胴体脂肪差异较小,不受处理影响(P>0.10)。低粗饲料日粮中黄色油脂的维持净能(NEm)和增重净能(NEg)值分别为3.55和2.65兆卡/千克,高粗饲料日粮中分别为5.71和4.65兆卡/千克。选用4头装有瘤胃和十二指肠近端套管的荷斯坦阉牛(体重233千克)评估处理对瘤胃和全肠道消化特性的影响。粗饲料水平与补充脂肪对瘤胃和全肠道有机物(OM)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、淀粉、脂质和总能消化率无交互作用(P>0.10)。瘤胃后脂质消化率平均为65.5%,不受粗饲料水平影响(P>0.10)。低粗饲料日粮和高粗饲料日粮中黄色油脂的代谢能(ME)值相同(6.94兆卡/千克)。补充脂肪与粗饲料水平对小肠非氨态氮流量(P<0.10)、瘤胃逃逸饲料氮百分比(P<0.05)、瘤胃后氮消化率(P<0.05)和甲烷产量(P<0.10)存在交互作用。在低粗饲料日粮中,补充脂肪对饲料氮的瘤胃降解率和甲烷产量无影响(P>0.10)。在高粗饲料日粮中,补充脂肪使饲料氮的瘤胃降解率降低了19.0%(P<0.05),甲烷产量降低了14.8%(P<0.05)。我们得出结论,在30%粗饲料(苜蓿干草)育肥日粮中添加6%黄色油脂,生长性能与不添加补充脂肪的10%粗饲料日粮的阉牛相似。性能改善可能归因于日粮能量密度增加以及对小肠蛋白质流量的正组合效应和瘤胃甲烷产量降低。