Cooper S D, Kyriazakis I, Oldham J D
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1240-51. doi: 10.2527/1996.7461240x.
We proposed an hypothesis that ruminants attempt to select a diet that promotes high levels of feed intake by maintaining optimal ruminal conditions. Three tests of the hypothesis considered whether the diet selection of sheep given either a choice of two high energy density (ED) feeds or a choice between a high and a low ED feed is affected by 1) sodium bicarbonate inclusion (NaHCO3; 1, 2, and 4% [wt/wt]) in the high [ED] feed); 2) dietary carbohydrate source (barley-based, B and sugar beet/ barley, S) of the high ED feed; or 3) physical form (alfalfa: pelleted, ALFP and long chop, ALFL) of the low ED feed. To conduct these, 42 lambs were used in seven 6 x 6 Latin squares, which were either foods ALFL and ALFP offered alone and paired with feed B or S and their NaHCO3 derivatives as a choice, or foods B and S offered alone and paired with their NaHCO3 derivatives as a choice. Each Latin square period lasted for 3 wk. For the choices between a NaHCO3-supplemented high ED feed and either a high or a low ED one, the inclusion of NaHCO3 increased feed intake. Its level of inclusion had a marked effect on the proportion of unsupplemented high ED feed selected (P < .05) but not on the proportion of low ED feed (alfalfa) selected. More alfalfa was selected when the high ED feed was based on barley (B) rather than sugar beet/barley (S) (P < .05). The physical form of the alfalfa affected diet selection because its selection was greater (P < .001) when ALFP (pelleted) was offered in the feed choice rather than ALFL (long-chop). The significant effects of NaHCO3 level, dietary carbohydrate, and physical form on the diet selection and feed intake of the sheep are consistent with the proposed experimental hypothesis.
我们提出了一个假设,即反刍动物试图选择一种通过维持最佳瘤胃条件来促进高水平采食量的日粮。该假设的三项试验考虑了给予绵羊两种高能量密度(ED)饲料选择或高、低能量密度饲料选择时,其日粮选择是否受以下因素影响:1)高能量密度饲料中碳酸氢钠的添加量(NaHCO₃;1%、2%和4%[重量/重量]);2)高能量密度饲料的日粮碳水化合物来源(以大麦为基础的,B和甜菜/大麦,S);或3)低能量密度饲料(苜蓿:颗粒状,ALFP和长切碎,ALFL)的物理形态。为进行这些试验,42只羔羊被用于7个6×6拉丁方试验,其中单独提供食物ALFL和ALFP,并与饲料B或S及其NaHCO₃衍生物配对作为选择,或者单独提供食物B和S,并与它们的NaHCO₃衍生物配对作为选择。每个拉丁方试验期持续3周。对于补充了NaHCO₃的高能量密度饲料与高或低能量密度饲料之间的选择,NaHCO₃的添加增加了采食量。其添加水平对未补充的高能量密度饲料的选择比例有显著影响(P < 0.05),但对低能量密度饲料(苜蓿)的选择比例没有影响。当高能量密度饲料以大麦(B)为基础而不是甜菜/大麦(S)时,选择的苜蓿更多(P < 0.05)。苜蓿的物理形态影响日粮选择,因为在饲料选择中提供颗粒状(ALFP)苜蓿时,其选择量更大(P < 0.001),而不是长切碎(ALFL)苜蓿。NaHCO₃水平、日粮碳水化合物和物理形态对绵羊日粮选择和采食量的显著影响与提出的实验假设一致。