Akin-Nergiz N, Nergiz I, Behlfelt K, Platzer U
Department of Orthodontics, University of Hamburg, Germany.
Eur J Orthod. 1996 Jun;18(3):295-301. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.3.295.
Shear bond strength and failure location were used to evaluate the effectiveness of plastic bracket primers for bonding diacrylate adhesives on a new fibre-reinforced polycarbonate bracket. Maxillary incisor polycarbonate and mesh-based brackets as control were bonded to human incisors with 14 different adhesives (four filled diacrylate two-paste, six diacrylate one-step and four power-liquid acrylic adhesives), and after thermo-cycling for 2000 cycles between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C, tested in shear. A non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test) was used to compare the shear bond strength of the polycarbonate brackets with the mesh based brackets and a One-way test (according to Scheffe) to compare the shear bond strength of different adhesives. The following conclusions can be made: 1. Seven of the 14 adhesives used in this study with both types of brackets demonstrated adequate shear bond strength values for the clinical application. The exceptions were: Achieve Mix, No-Mix:30 Silkon, Lee Insta-Bond, Ortho-Loc and Bond-Eze, all with too low a shear bond strength for one or both types of brackets, and finally Quasar, which used with the plastic brackets sometimes caused enamel fractures, due to high bond strength. 2. The adhesives with their own plastic primer demonstrated higher blood strength values than those without plastic primer, and two-paste adhesives used with plastic primer displayed a higher bond strength than the other adhesives. 3. Generally, the shear bond strength values of the one-step adhesives were lower compared with the two-paste adhesives. 4. The liquid-powder adhesives demonstrated very different values for bond strength.
