Baird R N, Abbott W M
Am J Physiol. 1977 Jul;233(1):H15-21. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1977.233.1.H15.
In this study, the pressure/strain and stress/strain relatioships of 44 jugular and 31 femoral canine vein segments were compared with 17 carotid artery specimens, latex rubber, and a synthetic graft material, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. A method is described for comparing the elastic properties of vein wall specimens of varying thicknesses such as occur after implantation into the arterial circulation. A flat sheet of opened vessel wall, fexed between retention rings at one end of a saline-filled steel cylinder, was biaxially distended to form a bubble shape. Compliance ratio and stress modulus were computed at 20-mmHg increments from 20 to 200 mmHg. In the "arterial" pressure range, vein was less compliant than artery. Vein also had a higher stress modulus E (dyn/cm2 X 10(6)) +/- SE at a chamber pressure 120 mmHg than artery (E = 11 +/- 0.6), and jugular vein was stiffer (E = 65 +/- 3.6) than femoral vein (E = 41.5 +/- 2.0). Changes in the structural properties of vein grafts measured using this technique are potentially important factors leading to graft failure.
在本研究中,将44个颈静脉和31个股静脉犬段的压力/应变及应力/应变关系与17个颈动脉标本、乳胶橡胶以及一种合成移植材料膨体聚四氟乙烯进行了比较。描述了一种用于比较不同厚度静脉壁标本弹性特性的方法,这些不同厚度的标本如在植入动脉循环后出现的情况。将一片打开的血管壁平板在充满盐水的钢筒一端的固定环之间弯曲,进行双轴扩张以形成气泡形状。顺应性比率和应力模量在20至200 mmHg范围内以20 mmHg的增量进行计算。在“动脉”压力范围内,静脉的顺应性低于动脉。在腔室压力为120 mmHg时,静脉的应力模量E(dyn/cm2×10(6))±标准误也高于动脉(E = 11±0.6),并且颈静脉比股静脉更硬(E = 65±3.6)(股静脉E = 41.5±2.0)。使用该技术测量的静脉移植物结构特性的变化是导致移植物失败的潜在重要因素。