Tanos V, Friedler S, Zajicek G, Neiger M, Lewin A, Schenker J G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;41(4):227-31. doi: 10.1159/000292274.
The efficacy of three protocols of endometrial preparation (spontaneous cycles, A: artificial preparation, B; ovarian stimulation, C) for cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer (CT-ET). The implantation and clinical pregnancy rates per cycle in 236 women undergoing 381 consecutive CT-ETs were evaluated according to the endometrial preparation protocol. No statistically significant difference was found in implantation rates per embryo transfer (A = 5.6%, B = 5.6%, C = 4.6%) and clinical pregnancy rates per cycle (A = 16.9%, B = 16.5%, C = 15.6%) between the three endometrial preparation protocols used. In conclusion, the specific method of endometrial preparation for CT-ET had no significant impact upon the implantation rate.
三种子宫内膜准备方案(自然周期,A:人工准备,B;卵巢刺激,C)用于冻融人类胚胎移植(CT-ET)的疗效。根据子宫内膜准备方案,对236名接受381次连续CT-ET的女性每个周期的着床率和临床妊娠率进行了评估。在所使用的三种子宫内膜准备方案之间,每次胚胎移植的着床率(A = 5.6%,B = 5.6%,C = 4.6%)和每个周期的临床妊娠率(A = 16.9%,B = 16.5%,C = 15.6%)均未发现统计学上的显著差异。总之,CT-ET的特定子宫内膜准备方法对着床率没有显著影响。