Chalkley D T
Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Aug;134(8):911-3. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.8.911.
The author discusses the evolution of federal constraints on medical, behavioral, and social science research. There has been only one court decision related to behavioral research and none in medical research. The burden of consent procedures can be lightened somewhat by careful consideration of the potential risks and nature of the research; questions are presented that can be used to determine whether constraints apply. The author notes that although there are good reasons for regulations in both behavioral and medical research, the appropriateness of current and proposed constraints is still a matter of debate.
作者探讨了联邦政府对医学、行为科学和社会科学研究限制的演变。与行为研究相关的法院判决仅有一例，而医学研究方面则没有。通过仔细考虑研究的潜在风险和性质，同意程序的负担可以有所减轻；文中提出了一些问题，可用于确定限制是否适用。作者指出，尽管行为研究和医学研究都有实施监管的充分理由，但现行及拟议限制措施的适当性仍是一个有争议的问题。
