• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较氨己烯酸、拉莫三嗪和加巴喷丁治疗顽固性部分性癫痫的成本最小化研究。

A cost minimization study comparing vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin for the treatment of intractable partial epilepsy.

作者信息

Hughes D, Cockerell O C

机构信息

Department of Economics, City University, London, UK.

出版信息

Seizure. 1996 Jun;5(2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(96)80100-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1059-1311(96)80100-2
PMID:8795122
Abstract

Epilepsy is one of the commonest of the serious neurological disorders. The total economic burden of epilepsy in the United Kingdom has been estimated to be 1930 m pounds, with around 32 m pounds spent on antiepileptic drug therapy alone. Despite the high level of expenditure on drug therapy for epilepsy there is very little information regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of the different drugs available. It is important to establish the relative cost-effectiveness of therapies to provide decision makers with the information necessary to allocate resources in a rational manner and thus achieve the highest benefit for available resources. In this study the cost-effectiveness of lamotrigine, vigabatrin and gabapentin was estimated by a cost minimization analysis for the first year of drug therapy using data based on published studies. In general, there was little difference between the initial direct costs of treatment, however, the fewer side-effects associated with gabapentin is reflected in the lower total costs of treatment in the first year resulting in savings of 18.52 pounds per patient compared with lamotrigine and 47.18 pounds compared with vigabatrin. Based on incidence data estimates this translates to estimated direct cost savings to the UK of between 166,680 pounds and 424,620 pounds per annum.

摘要

癫痫是最常见的严重神经疾病之一。据估计,英国癫痫的总经济负担为1.93亿英镑,仅抗癫痫药物治疗一项就花费约3200万英镑。尽管癫痫药物治疗的支出水平很高,但关于现有不同药物的相对成本效益的信息却非常少。确定治疗方法的相对成本效益很重要,以便为决策者提供合理分配资源所需的信息,从而使可用资源获得最大效益。在本研究中,使用基于已发表研究的数据,通过成本最小化分析估算了拉莫三嗪、氨己烯酸和加巴喷丁在药物治疗第一年的成本效益。一般来说,初始治疗直接成本之间差异不大,然而,加巴喷丁相关副作用较少,这反映在第一年较低的治疗总成本上,与拉莫三嗪相比,每位患者可节省18.52英镑,与氨己烯酸相比可节省47.18英镑。根据发病率数据估算,这意味着英国每年可节省166,680英镑至424,620英镑的直接成本。

相似文献

1
A cost minimization study comparing vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin for the treatment of intractable partial epilepsy.一项比较氨己烯酸、拉莫三嗪和加巴喷丁治疗顽固性部分性癫痫的成本最小化研究。
Seizure. 1996 Jun;5(2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(96)80100-2.
2
If comparisons can be odious, so can assumptions.如果说比较会招人怨恨,那么假设也同样如此。
Seizure. 1996 Sep;5(3):247-8. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(96)80045-8.
3
Adjunctive therapy in epilepsy: a cost-effectiveness comparison of alternative treatment options.癫痫的辅助治疗:替代治疗方案的成本效益比较
Seizure. 1995 Mar;4(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(05)80076-7.
4
Costing of antiepileptic drugs.抗癫痫药物的成本核算
Lancet. 1996 Jan 27;347(8996):266. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90443-2.
5
New antiepileptic drugs for children: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin.儿童新型抗癫痫药物:非氨酯、加巴喷丁、拉莫三嗪和氨己烯酸。
J Child Neurol. 1994 Oct;9 Suppl 1:S33-45. doi: 10.1177/0883073894009001071.
6
An audit of the new antiepileptic drugs in clinical neurological practice.临床神经病学实践中新型抗癫痫药物的审计
Seizure. 1996 Jun;5(2):127-30. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(96)80106-3.
7
A naturalistic study of the use of vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin in adults with learning disabilities.一项关于氨己烯酸、拉莫三嗪和加巴喷丁在成年学习障碍患者中使用情况的自然主义研究。
Seizure. 1997 Apr;6(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(97)80066-0.
8
Management strategies for refractory localization-related seizures.难治性局灶性相关性癫痫发作的管理策略
Epilepsia. 2001;42 Suppl 3:27-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.042suppl.3027.x.
9
Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio.新型抗癫痫药物。旨在改善风险效益比。
Drug Saf. 1994 Jul;11(1):37-67. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199411010-00005.
10
The role of newer anticonvulsants in the management of epilepsy.新型抗惊厥药物在癫痫治疗中的作用。
Aust N Z J Med. 1995 Apr;25(2):114-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1995.tb02821.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The cost effectiveness of newer epilepsy treatments: a review of the literature on partial-onset seizures.新型癫痫治疗的成本效益:部分发作性癫痫文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Oct 1;30(10):903-23. doi: 10.2165/11597110-000000000-00000.
2
Utilization and costs of antiepileptic drugs in the elderly: still an unsolved issue.老年人抗癫痫药物的使用情况及费用:仍是一个未解决的问题。
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(2):157-68. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200926020-00007.
3
Economic analysis of newer antiepileptic drugs.
CNS Drugs. 2008;22(10):861-75. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822100-00006.
4
Prescribing antiepileptic drugs: should patients be switched on the basis of cost?抗癫痫药物的处方:患者是否应根据成本进行换药?
CNS Drugs. 2004;18(10):617-28. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418100-00001.
5
Cost-of-illness of epilepsy in Italy. Data from a multicentre observational study (Episcreen).意大利癫痫的疾病成本。一项多中心观察性研究(Episcreen)的数据。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Feb;17(2):197-208. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017020-00008.
6
The costs of epilepsy and cost-based evaluations of anticonvulsants.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Oct;12(4):446-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712040-00003.