• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因联合硫喷妥钠辅助喉罩置入术。局部给药与静脉给药的比较。

Lignocaine to aid the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway with thiopentone. A comparison between topical and intravenous administration.

作者信息

Cook T M, Seavell C R, Cox C M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1996 Aug;51(8):787-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07899.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07899.x
PMID:8795328
Abstract

Conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in 90 unpremedicated adult were patients were assessed in a randomised, single-blinded trial. Each patient received fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1 and thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1, and this was preceded either by lignocaine 0.5 mg.kg-1 intravenously (group 1), lignocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenously (group 2) or 40 mg of topical lignocaine spray to the posterior pharyngeal wall (group 3). Conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion were recorded. The group receiving topical lignocaine had a lower incidence of laryngospasm (p < 0.05), required fewer attempts for successful insertion of the laryngeal mask (p < 0.05) and coughed or gagged less frequently than either group receiving lignocaine intravenously (p > 0.05). Overall, the conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion were better in the topical group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in haemodynamic response and apnoea between the three groups. Topical lignocaine spray prior to thiopentone provides conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask that are superior to those provided by lignocaine and thiopentone intravenously.

摘要

在一项随机、单盲试验中,对90例未使用术前药的成年患者插入喉罩气道的条件进行了评估。每位患者均接受1微克/千克的芬太尼和5毫克/千克的硫喷妥钠,在此之前,分别静脉注射0.5毫克/千克的利多卡因(第1组)、1.5毫克/千克的利多卡因(第2组)或对咽后壁喷洒40毫克的利多卡因局部喷雾剂(第3组)。记录插入喉罩气道的条件。接受局部利多卡因治疗的组喉痉挛发生率较低(p<0.05),成功插入喉罩所需的尝试次数较少(p<0.05),咳嗽或 gagging(此处原文可能有误,推测为“呛咳”)的频率低于接受静脉注射利多卡因的任何一组(p>0.05)。总体而言,局部用药组插入喉罩气道的条件更好(p<0.05)。三组之间的血流动力学反应和呼吸暂停无显著差异。硫喷妥钠之前使用局部利多卡因喷雾剂为插入喉罩提供的条件优于静脉注射利多卡因和硫喷妥钠所提供的条件。

相似文献

1
Lignocaine to aid the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway with thiopentone. A comparison between topical and intravenous administration.利多卡因联合硫喷妥钠辅助喉罩置入术。局部给药与静脉给药的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Aug;51(8):787-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07899.x.
2
Topical lignocaine and thiopentone for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway; a comparison with propofol.用于插入喉罩气道的局部利多卡因和硫喷妥钠;与丙泊酚的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Jul;51(7):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07860.x.
3
Comparison of topical and intravenous lignocaine with thiopentone for insertion of laryngeal mask airway.局部应用利多卡因与静脉注射硫喷妥钠联合利多卡因用于喉罩置入的比较。
Trop Doct. 2001 Apr;31(2):120-1. doi: 10.1177/004947550103100231.
4
Comparison of propofol versus thiopentone with midazolam or lidocaine to facilitate laryngeal mask insertion.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠联合咪达唑仑或利多卡因用于辅助喉罩置入的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;43(6):564-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011767.
5
Insertion of LMA: thiopentone with topical lignocaine.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Feb;21(1):130.
6
Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion.静脉注射利多卡因可改善丙泊酚靶控输注期间喉罩置入的条件。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 May;26(5):377-81. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831dcd4d.
7
Facilitation of laryngeal mask insertion. Effects of lignocaine given intravenously before induction with propofol.喉罩置入的辅助作用。异丙酚诱导前静脉注射利多卡因的效果。
Anaesthesia. 1995 May;50(5):464-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06007.x.
8
Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction.静脉注射芬太尼与局部使用利多卡因用于丙泊酚诱导下插入ProSeal™喉罩气道的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 20;9:979275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.979275. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparison of butorphanol and thiopentone vs fentanyl and thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion.布托啡诺与硫喷妥钠联用对比芬太尼与硫喷妥钠联用在喉罩置入中的效果
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb;18(1):8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.04.007.
10
Topical lidocaine improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion.局部利多卡因可改善喉罩气道插入条件。
Can J Anaesth. 2010 May;57(5):446-52. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9281-9. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Thiopental Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil for Successful Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Trial.硫喷妥钠与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼用于成功置入经典喉罩气道的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;18(8):1173. doi: 10.3390/ph18081173.
2
The Effect of Adding Remifentanil to Thiopental for Anaesthesia Induction on the Success of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial.在硫喷妥钠麻醉诱导中添加瑞芬太尼对经典喉罩置入成功率的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;18(5):654. doi: 10.3390/ph18050654.
3
Effects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine with Propofol on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity: A Prospective Study of 80 Patients.
瑞芬太尼和右美托咪定联合丙泊酚对喉罩置入、血流动力学稳定性及咽喉部并发症的影响:一项针对80例患者的前瞻性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 15;31:e948186. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948186.
4
Comparison of thiopentone with lidocaine spray vs propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion at tikur anbessa specialized hospital. A prospective cohort study.在提库尔安贝萨专科医院比较硫喷妥钠与利多卡因喷雾和丙泊酚用于喉罩置入的效果。一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jun 2;66:102436. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102436. eCollection 2021 Jun.