• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于插入喉罩气道的局部利多卡因和硫喷妥钠;与丙泊酚的比较。

Topical lignocaine and thiopentone for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway; a comparison with propofol.

作者信息

Seavell C R, Cook T M, Cox C M

机构信息

Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1996 Jul;51(7):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07860.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07860.x
PMID:8758170
Abstract

We assessed conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway in 90 unpremedicated adult patients who received either thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 preceded by 40 mg of topical lignocaine spray to the posterior pharyngeal wall or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 alone in a randomised, single-blinded trial. All patients received fentanyl 1 microgram.kg-1. Gagging, coughing and laryngospasm following laryngeal mask insertion were graded and haemodynamic data and apnoea times were recorded. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the incidence of gagging, coughing and laryngospasm, but the apnoea time was significantly less in the thiopentone group (p < 0.005). The decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, following induction and the insertion of a laryngeal mask with propofol was significantly greater than following thiopentone (p < 0.05--systolic, p < 0.01--diastolic). We conclude that thiopentone preceded by topical lignocaine spray provides conditions for insertion of a laryngeal mask equal to those of propofol, with more haemodynamic stability and a shorter period of apnoea.

摘要

在一项随机、单盲试验中,我们评估了90例未使用术前药的成年患者插入喉罩气道的情况。这些患者随机分为两组,一组在给予5mg/kg硫喷妥钠前,先向咽后壁喷洒40mg局部麻醉药利多卡因;另一组仅给予2.5mg/kg丙泊酚。所有患者均接受1μg/kg芬太尼。记录插入喉罩后的呛咳、咳嗽和喉痉挛情况并进行分级,同时记录血流动力学数据和呼吸暂停时间。两组在呛咳、咳嗽和喉痉挛的发生率方面无显著差异,但硫喷妥钠组的呼吸暂停时间明显更短(p<0.005)。诱导和插入喉罩后,丙泊酚组收缩压和舒张压的下降幅度明显大于硫喷妥钠组(收缩压p<0.05,舒张压p<0.01)。我们得出结论,在喷洒局部麻醉药利多卡因后使用硫喷妥钠,为插入喉罩提供的条件与丙泊酚相当,血流动力学更稳定,呼吸暂停时间更短。

相似文献

1
Topical lignocaine and thiopentone for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway; a comparison with propofol.用于插入喉罩气道的局部利多卡因和硫喷妥钠;与丙泊酚的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Jul;51(7):699-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07860.x.
2
Lignocaine to aid the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway with thiopentone. A comparison between topical and intravenous administration.利多卡因联合硫喷妥钠辅助喉罩置入术。局部给药与静脉给药的比较。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Aug;51(8):787-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07899.x.
3
Comparison of propofol versus thiopentone with midazolam or lidocaine to facilitate laryngeal mask insertion.丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠联合咪达唑仑或利多卡因用于辅助喉罩置入的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;43(6):564-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03011767.
4
Lidocaine given intravenously improves conditions for laryngeal mask airway insertion during propofol target-controlled infusion.静脉注射利多卡因可改善丙泊酚靶控输注期间喉罩置入的条件。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 May;26(5):377-81. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831dcd4d.
5
The use of thiopentone/propofol admixture for laryngeal mask airway insertion.硫喷妥钠/丙泊酚混合剂用于喉罩置入术
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Feb;29(1):38-42. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0102900107.
6
Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone.在使用丙泊酚或硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉后患者对喉罩插入的反应。
Can J Anaesth. 1993 Sep;40(9):816-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03009250.
7
Co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol.联合诱导与喉罩置入:硫喷妥钠与丙泊酚的比较
Anaesthesia. 1997 Jul;52(7):698-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.az0130b.x.
8
Facilitation of laryngeal mask insertion. Effects of lignocaine given intravenously before induction with propofol.喉罩置入的辅助作用。异丙酚诱导前静脉注射利多卡因的效果。
Anaesthesia. 1995 May;50(5):464-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb06007.x.
9
Comparison of propofol and increased doses of thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion.丙泊酚与递增剂量硫喷妥钠用于喉罩置入的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Nov;39(8):1103-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb04238.x.
10
Comparison of butorphanol and thiopentone vs fentanyl and thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion.布托啡诺与硫喷妥钠联用对比芬太尼与硫喷妥钠联用在喉罩置入中的效果
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb;18(1):8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.04.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Thiopental Versus Propofol in Combination with Remifentanil for Successful Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Trial.硫喷妥钠与丙泊酚联合瑞芬太尼用于成功置入经典喉罩气道的前瞻性、随机、双盲试验
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;18(8):1173. doi: 10.3390/ph18081173.
2
Comparison of the Effects of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine and Thiopental-Dexmedetomidine Combinations on the Success of Classical Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertions, Hemodynamic Responses, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity.丙泊酚-右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠-右美托咪定联合用药对经典喉罩置入成功率、血流动力学反应及咽喉部并发症影响的比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 23;61(5):783. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050783.
3
Intravenous fentanyl vs. topical lignocaine for ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol induction.
静脉注射芬太尼与局部使用利多卡因用于丙泊酚诱导下插入ProSeal™喉罩气道的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 20;9:979275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.979275. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Face Mask in Children Airway Management.比较喉罩气道、Cobra喉周气道和面罩在儿童气道管理中的应用
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016 Apr;44(2):81-5. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2016.19970. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Randomized double-blind comparison of ketamine-propofol and fentanyl-propofol for the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in children.氯胺酮-丙泊酚与芬太尼-丙泊酚用于儿童喉罩置入术的随机双盲对照研究
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):91-6.