Murphy D J, Squier M V, Hope P L, Sellers S, Johnson A
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary NHS Trust, Oxford.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996 Jul;75(1):F27-32. doi: 10.1136/fn.75.1.f27.
Neuropathological examinations were carried out at necropsy on 83 very pre-term babies who died during their first hospital admission. Forty seven (57%) babies had evidence of cerebral damage-39 with ischaemic white matter damage. The time of onset of ischaemic lesions was thought to be prenatal in 12 cases (31%) and postnatal in a further 12 (31%). The exact timing of damage could not be determined in 15 (38%) cases. Maternal and neonatal case notes were reviewed to ascertain clinical associations of ischaemic white matter damage. There were no clear associations between adverse clinical factors and prenatal ischaemic white matter damage. In contrast, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, and delivery without labour were associated with postnatal damage as were neonatal sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis, and seizures. The absence of a clear association between the timing of adverse clinical factors and the timing of ischaemic cerebral damage suggests that cerebral damage in very preterm babies may result from a sequence of events rather than one specific insult.
对83例首次住院期间死亡的极早产儿进行了尸检时的神经病理学检查。47例(57%)婴儿有脑损伤证据,其中39例有缺血性白质损伤。缺血性病变的发病时间被认为在12例(31%)中为产前,另有12例(31%)为产后。15例(38%)病例无法确定损伤的确切时间。回顾了母亲和新生儿的病历记录以确定缺血性白质损伤的临床关联因素。不良临床因素与产前缺血性白质损伤之间没有明确的关联。相比之下,先兆子痫、宫内生长受限和未临产分娩与产后损伤相关,新生儿败血症、坏死性小肠结肠炎和癫痫发作也与之相关。不良临床因素的发生时间与缺血性脑损伤的时间之间缺乏明确关联,这表明极早产儿的脑损伤可能是一系列事件导致的,而非单一特定损伤所致。