• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Who needs surveillance of the contralateral carotid artery?

作者信息

Iafrati M D, Salamipour H, Young C, Mackey W C, O'Donnell T F

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1996 Aug;172(2):136-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00135-3.

DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00135-3
PMID:8795515
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the value of carotid endarterectomy has been proven, postoperative surveillance remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the natural history of disease progression in the contralateral carotid artery by duplex surveillance, and to assess the cost of stroke prevention on this contralateral side.

METHODS

Vascular laboratory records were reviewed to identify carotid endarterectomy patients who had two or more duplex studies between 1984 and 1995. Critical stenosis was defined as > or = 75% area reduction.

RESULTS

In all, 324 patients were followed up with duplex scans for 1 month to 11 years (mean 30.3 months). The only factors that correlated with progression to critical stenosis were age and initial stenosis. Overall, 19.5% of patients progressed to critical stenosis within 5 years while the high-risk groups with age > 65 years or initial stenosis > or = 50% progressed to critical disease in 27% and 39%, respectively (P < or = 0.05). The cost per stroke prevented ranged from $143,500 to $418,200 when stratified by initial stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have undergone a carotid endarterectomy demonstrate a propensity for progression of carotid stenosis in the unoperated (contralateral) artery. The cost/benefit ratio may be improved by varying the intensity of duplex surveillance of the contralateral carotid based on the patient's age and initial degree of stenosis.

摘要

相似文献

1
Who needs surveillance of the contralateral carotid artery?
Am J Surg. 1996 Aug;172(2):136-9. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00135-3.
2
Is routine carotid ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy worthwhile?颈动脉内膜切除术后进行常规颈动脉超声监测是否值得?
Am J Surg. 1996 Aug;172(2):140-2; discussion 143. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00136-5.
3
Progression of atherosclerosis in asymptomatic carotid arteries after contralateral endarterectomy: a 10-year prospective study.对侧颈动脉内膜切除术后无症状颈动脉粥样硬化的进展:一项为期10年的前瞻性研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;45(3):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
4
Disease progression in contralateral carotid artery is common after endarterectomy.内膜切除术后对侧颈动脉疾病进展很常见。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;39(1):52-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.08.016.
5
The value of a carotid duplex surveillance program for stroke prevention.颈动脉双功超声监测项目在预防中风方面的价值。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;25(7):887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.021. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
6
A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后双功超声监测的合理算法。
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Sep;30(3):453-60. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70072-8.
7
The value and economic analysis of routine postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后常规颈动脉双功超声监测的价值及经济分析
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;62(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 May 9.
8
Is routine duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy cost-effective?
Surgery. 1998 Aug;124(2):343-51; discussion 351-2.
9
Clinical follow-up rather than duplex surveillance after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后采用临床随访而非双功超声监测。
J Vasc Surg. 1997 Jan;25(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70321-5.
10
Medical cost savings through stroke prevention from 100 consecutive new carotid duplex scans.通过连续100例新的颈动脉双功超声扫描预防中风所节省的医疗费用。
Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Dec;4(6):753-8. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(96)00057-9.