Kirsner R S, Federman D G
Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Fla, USA.
Arch Dermatol. 1996 Sep;132(9):1043-6.
We determine whether a subset of internists exist who are better at diagnosing skin disease and therefore select themselves to treat the majority of patients with dermatologic disorders. A survey was conducted in which internists reported their self-perception regarding their abilities in dermatology, the amount of dermatology training they had received, and the percentage of patients they encounter with and treat for skin diseases. This was correlated with results from an objective photographic (Kodachrome) examination assessing their diagnostic abilities in dermatology. The setting was university and private practices in Miami, Fla, and New Haven, Conn. The participants were general internists, medical subspecialists, and medical residents. After completing a self-administered questionnaire, each physician then participated in an examination where they were shown 20 color photographs of common skin disorders. We correlate the relationship between the survey variables and the results of the photographic examination.
Eighty-four internists diagnosed 50.5% of the diseases correctly. Internists perceive themselves as mediocre in dermatology (2.6, on a scale of 1-5, 5 being the best), which correlated with their poor performance on the photographic evaluation (P = .04). Internists reported having limited education or training in dermatology (> 85% having < 1 month of training in or after medical school). There was a trend toward a correlation between the amount of training internists received and their ability in dermatology (P = .07). Notably , there was no correlation between internists' ability in dermatology and the percentage of patients they encounter with and treat for skin disease.
Internists receive limited training and have resultant poor performance in diagnosing skin disease. Internists are aware of their limited ability in dermatology as demonstrated by their mediocre self-perceived ability. Notably, no correlation was found between internists' abilities in dermatology and the percentage of patients they encounter and treat for skin disease. Therefore, we did not demonstrate a subset of internists, superior at dermatology, who treat the majority of patients with skin disease. This suggests patients with skin disease may be better served by dermatologists.
我们要确定是否存在这样一部分内科医生,他们更擅长诊断皮肤病,从而选择自己来治疗大多数皮肤病患者。我们进行了一项调查,让内科医生报告他们对自己皮肤病诊断能力的自我认知、接受过的皮肤病培训量,以及他们接诊和治疗皮肤病患者的比例。这与一项客观的照片(柯达彩色胶片)检查结果相关,该检查评估了他们的皮肤病诊断能力。研究地点为佛罗里达州迈阿密和康涅狄格州纽黑文的大学及私人诊所。参与者包括普通内科医生、医学亚专科医生和住院医师。在完成一份自行填写的问卷后,每位医生接着参加一项检查,他们会看到20张常见皮肤病的彩色照片。我们将调查变量与照片检查结果之间的关系进行了关联分析。
84名内科医生正确诊断了50.5%的疾病。内科医生认为自己在皮肤病诊断方面表现一般(在1至5分的量表上为2.6分,5分为最佳),这与他们在照片评估中的不佳表现相关(P = 0.04)。内科医生报告称他们在皮肤病方面接受的教育或培训有限(超过85%的人在医学院期间或之后接受的培训少于1个月)。内科医生接受的培训量与他们的皮肤病诊断能力之间存在一定的相关趋势(P = 0.07)。值得注意的是,内科医生的皮肤病诊断能力与他们接诊和治疗皮肤病患者的比例之间没有相关性。
内科医生接受的皮肤病培训有限,因此在诊断皮肤病方面表现不佳。内科医生意识到自己在皮肤病方面能力有限,这从他们自我评价能力一般可以看出。值得注意的是,未发现内科医生的皮肤病诊断能力与他们接诊和治疗皮肤病患者的比例之间存在相关性。因此,我们没有发现有一部分在皮肤病方面表现出色的内科医生来治疗大多数皮肤病患者。这表明皮肤病患者可能由皮肤科医生治疗会更好。