Suppr超能文献

同步逆行灌注对冠状动脉压力-流量关系的影响。

Effects of synchronized retroperfusion on the coronary arterial pressure-flow relationship.

作者信息

Mitsugi M, Saito T, Saitoh S, Sato M, Maruyama Y

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Fukushima Medical College, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Res. 1996 Aug;32(2):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0008-6363(96)00050-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of diastolic coronary sinus pressure elevation due to synchronized retroperfusion (SRP) with systolic coronary sinus pressure elevation due to coronary sinus occlusion on the coronary pressure-flow relationship under similar mean coronary sinus pressure values.

METHODS

Using isolated, perfused canine hearts, coronary perfusion of the left anterior descending artery was reduced gradually, setting the mean coronary sinus pressure to 14.2 +/- 5.7 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.) under control conditions, 30.3 +/- 4.9 mmHg under SRP with lower retrograde perfusion flow [SRP(L)], 30.7 +/- 4.6 mmHg under coronary sinus partial occlusion [CSPO], 51.9 +/- 7.9 mmHg under SRP with higher retrograde perfusion flow [SRP(H)] and 49.0 +/- 7.9 mmHg under coronary sinus complete occlusion [CSCO]. Zero-flow pressure and the slopes of pressure-flow relationship were determined in each condition.

RESULTS

The mean values of the slopes did not significantly differ among the interventions. The mean control value of zero-flow pressure was 17.4 +/- 4.3 mmHg. Zero-flow pressure of SRP(L) was 20.0 +/- 3.5 mmHg, which was not a significant increase, whilst zero-flow pressure of CSPO was 22.9 +/- 3.4 mmHg, a significant increase compared with control (P < 0.05). Zero-flow pressure of SRP(H) and CSCO was 26.0 +/- 4.5 and 31.3 +/- 6.7 mmHg, respectively, and both were significantly higher than control (P < 0.01). Zero-flow pressure of SRP(H) was, however, significantly lower than CSCO (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SRP, which causes diastolic coronary sinus pressure elevation, does not greatly affect coronary arterial inflow, compared with coronary sinus occlusion which causes systolic coronary sinus pressure elevation. These results suggest that the blood volume contained in the heart during systole plays a role in determining coronary inflow. Therefore, SRP intervention, which does not interfere with venous outflow during systole, may ameliorate injured myocardium during ischaemia without seriously affecting coronary inflow supply.

摘要

目的

我们比较了在相似的平均冠状窦压力值下,同步逆行灌注(SRP)导致的舒张期冠状窦压力升高与冠状窦闭塞导致的收缩期冠状窦压力升高对冠状动脉压力-流量关系的影响。

方法

使用离体灌注犬心脏,逐渐减少左前降支的冠状动脉灌注,在对照条件下将平均冠状窦压力设定为14.2±5.7 mmHg(平均值±标准差),在较低逆行灌注流量的SRP [SRP(L)]下为30.3±4.9 mmHg,在冠状窦部分闭塞(CSPO)下为30.7±4.6 mmHg,在较高逆行灌注流量的SRP [SRP(H)]下为51.9±7.9 mmHg,在冠状窦完全闭塞(CSCO)下为49.0±7.9 mmHg。在每种情况下测定零流量压力和压力-流量关系的斜率。

结果

各干预措施下斜率的平均值无显著差异。零流量压力的平均对照值为17.4±4.3 mmHg。SRP(L)的零流量压力为20.0±3.5 mmHg,无显著升高,而CSPO的零流量压力为22.9±3.4 mmHg,与对照相比显著升高(P<0.05)。SRP(H)和CSCO的零流量压力分别为26.0±4.5和31.3±6.7 mmHg,均显著高于对照(P<0.01)。然而,SRP(H)的零流量压力显著低于CSCO(P<0.05)。

结论

与导致收缩期冠状窦压力升高的冠状窦闭塞相比,导致舒张期冠状窦压力升高的SRP对冠状动脉血流影响不大。这些结果表明,心脏在收缩期所含的血容量在决定冠状动脉血流方面起作用。因此,不干扰收缩期静脉流出的SRP干预可能在不严重影响冠状动脉血流供应的情况下改善缺血期间受损的心肌。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验