Suppr超能文献

调节性集合交联中的增益变化。

Gain changes in the accommodative convergence cross-link.

作者信息

Bobier W R, McRae M

机构信息

School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Jul;16(4):318-25.

PMID:8796201
Abstract

The output of the accommodative vergence cross-link, the AC/A ratio, was measured before and after subjects viewed through a telestereoscope which increased their interocular separation (pd) approximately fourfold. The initial paradigm was designed to force an increase in the AC/A ratio in that subjects alternately fixated targets set at differing distances. In this paradigm, the varying vergence demands could not be met by a constant increase in phasic or tonic vergence responses. In a second paradigm, only one target was viewed at a fixed position from the eye. Now the constant vergence demand could be met by a set increase in phasic and/or tonic vergence. A significant increase in the AC/A ratio was found in the two-target study but not in the single-target study. Increases in the accommodative vergence gain did show considerable individual differences. Tonic vergence changes were interpolated from the data. This parameter increased significantly in both cases but more so when two targets were alternately fixated. This finding is consistent with current near triad models which predict that accommodative convergence input acts along with disparity vergence input to increase tonic levels of convergence. When AC/A ratios were calculated using clinical measures of the phoria at 6 and 0.4 m, increases were found in the two-target study and to a lesser degree in the single-target study. This clinical method of AC/A measure appears to have been confounded by changes in tonic vergence.

摘要

在受试者通过望远立体镜观察前后,测量调节性聚散交叉联系的输出,即AC/A比率。该望远立体镜使受试者的眼间距(pd)增加了约四倍。最初的实验范式旨在迫使AC/A比率增加,即受试者交替注视设置在不同距离的目标。在这种范式中,相位性或紧张性聚散反应的持续增加无法满足变化的聚散需求。在第二种范式中,仅从眼睛的固定位置观察一个目标。现在,通过相位性和/或紧张性聚散的设定增加可以满足恒定的聚散需求。在双目标研究中发现AC/A比率有显著增加,但在单目标研究中未发现。调节性聚散增益的增加确实显示出相当大的个体差异。紧张性聚散变化是从数据中推断出来的。该参数在两种情况下均显著增加,但在交替注视两个目标时增加得更多。这一发现与当前的近三联模型一致,该模型预测调节性集合输入与视差性聚散输入共同作用,以提高紧张性集合水平。当使用6米和0.4米处隐斜的临床测量值计算AC/A比率时,在双目标研究中发现有所增加,在单目标研究中增加程度较小。这种AC/A测量的临床方法似乎受到了紧张性聚散变化的混淆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验