• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量数字发光射线照片的锐化掩膜:接受者操作特征分析结果

Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.

作者信息

Müller R D, Voss M, Hirche H, Buddenbrock B, John V, Bosch E

机构信息

Central Radiological Diagnostic Institute, University Hospital Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 1996;6(4):526-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00182488.

DOI:10.1007/BF00182488
PMID:8798037
Abstract

The extent to which the diagnostic performance of low-dosed storage phosphors can be improved by suitable image postprocessing was investigated. Storage phosphor radiographs and conventional 200- and 400-speed screen-film combinations of an anthropomorphic chest phantom with simulated nodules and linear structures were compared. The detection of test bodies was determined in a ROC analysis based on 16200 individual observations. The two analog screen-film systems did not differ significantly. As far as the storage phosphor radiographs are concerned, a higher diagnostic performance was achieved with a large filter kernel (S 40) whereas small filter kernels and edge-enhanced imaging modes reduced the detection of detail. The image quality of low-dosed storage phosphors is thus similar to high-amplification screen-film combinations if large filter kernels are used in postprocessing of the image.

摘要

研究了通过合适的图像后处理可在多大程度上提高低剂量存储磷光体的诊断性能。比较了存储磷光体射线照片与具有模拟结节和线性结构的拟人化胸部体模的传统200速和400速增感屏-胶片组合。基于16200个单独观察结果,在ROC分析中确定了测试物体的检测情况。两种模拟增感屏-胶片系统没有显著差异。就存储磷光体射线照片而言,使用大滤波核(S 40)可实现更高的诊断性能,而小滤波核和边缘增强成像模式会降低细节检测。因此,如果在图像后处理中使用大滤波核,低剂量存储磷光体的图像质量类似于高放大倍率增感屏-胶片组合。

相似文献

1
Unsharp masking of low-dosed digital luminescence radiographs: results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis.低剂量数字发光射线照片的锐化掩膜:接受者操作特征分析结果
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(4):526-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00182488.
2
[ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
Rofo. 1995 Feb;162(2):163-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015854.
3
Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.硒放射成像与存储磷光体成像及传统放射成像在模拟胸部病变检测中的比较
Radiology. 1996 Oct;201(1):45-50. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816519.
4
ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.胸部X线摄影中模拟和数字平片系统检测性能的ROC分析。
Acta Radiol. 1996 Nov;37(6):847-54. doi: 10.1177/02841851960373P282.
5
Frequency-filtered image post-processing of digital luminescence radiographs in pulmonary nodule imaging.肺部结节成像中数字发光射线照片的频率滤波图像后处理
Clin Radiol. 1996 Aug;51(8):577-86. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80140-1.
6
Phantom study of chest radiography with storage phosphor, selenium, and film-screen systems.
Acta Radiol. 1996 May;37(3 Pt 1):332-6. doi: 10.1177/02841851960371P170.
7
[The visibility of a central venous catheter using digital luminescence radiography in intensive care radiology].
Rofo. 1992 Jan;156(1):68-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032838.
8
[Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].[采用存储磷光体屏的数字乳腺摄影放大技术中的图像质量与辐射剂量]
Rofo. 1999 Jul;171(1):60-4. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-9894.
9
Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.减少照射剂量对计算机X线摄影的影响:胸部体模的结节检测准确性与传统及非对称屏-片X线摄影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):269-73. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618538.
10
Effects of varying filter kernel sizes on the image quality of interstitial lung diseases.不同滤波核大小对间质性肺疾病图像质量的影响。
Acta Radiol. 1996 Sep;37(5):732-40. doi: 10.1177/02841851960373P262.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.光激励荧光体计算机X线摄影的物理特性
Br J Radiol. 1993 Apr;66(784):332-45. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-784-332.
2
[Are high-intensifying film-screen combinations suitable for the detection of fine interstitial lung changes? The results of a ROC study with an anthropomorphic thorax phantom].[高强化增感屏-胶片组合是否适用于检测肺部细微间质改变?一项使用拟人化胸部模型的ROC研究结果]
Rofo. 1993 Jul;159(1):54-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032721.
3
[ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
Rofo. 1995 Feb;162(2):163-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015854.
4
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
5
[Estimation of organ dose during radiological and computer tomographic examinations with calculations of the somatically significant doses (author's transl)].
Rofo. 1980 Oct;133(4):425-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1056757.
6
Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.细微肺部异常的数字X线摄影:像素大小对观察者表现影响的ROC研究
Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):21-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.1.3940383.
7
The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images.不同高通滤波器参数对数字化胸部图像中孤立性肺结节可检测性的影响。
Invest Radiol. 1986 Apr;21(4):305-10.
8
Pneumothorax and other lung diseases: effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs.气胸及其他肺部疾病:分辨率改变和边缘增强对数字化X线片诊断的影响
Radiology. 1988 Apr;167(1):83-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.167.1.3347752.
9
Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance.图像处理对数字化胸部X线片结节检出率的影响:观察者表现的ROC研究
Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):447-50. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.2.3336719.
10
Digital radiography of the chest: promises and problems [publihsed erratum appears in AJR 1988 Sep;151(3):preceding 641].胸部数字放射摄影:前景与问题[勘误表见《美国放射学杂志》1988年9月;151(3):641之前]
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Jun;150(6):1241-52. doi: 10.2214/ajr.150.6.1241.