Pitkänen A, Tuunanen J, Halonen T
A.I. Virtanen Institute, University of Kuopio, Finland.
Epilepsy Res. 1996 May;24(1):29-45. doi: 10.1016/0920-1211(95)00093-3.
The present study compares the efficacy of carbamazepine (20 mg/kg/day) and vigabatrin (250 mg/kg/day) in preventing hippocampal and amygdaloid damage in the perforant pathway stimulation model of status epilepticus in the rat. One group of rats received a combination of the drugs. Drug treatments were started one week before the stimulation and continued for two weeks thereafter. Gallyas silver impregnation and somatostatin immunohistochemistry were used to detect neuronal damage. All drug treatments were equally effective in decreasing the number and severity of seizures during electrical stimulation. In the vigabatrin group, the damage to the hilar somatostatin-immunoreactive (SOM-ir) neurons and hippocampal CA3c pyramidal cells was less severe than in the vehicle (SOM-ir, P < 0.01; CA3c, P < 0.05) and carbamazepine (SOM-ir, P < 0.01; CA3c, P < 0.05) groups. In the carbamazepine and combination groups, the severity of neuronal damage in the hippocampus did not differ from that in vehicle-treated animals. The amygdaloid neurons were not protected by any of the treatments. Our results show that even though vigabatrin and carbamazepine treatments had similar anticonvulsant efficacy during the perforant pathway stimulation, only vigabatrin but not carbamazepine decreased seizure-induced neuronal damage. Vigabatrin decreased neuronal damage in the hippocampus but not in the amygdala. These results demonstrate that different brain regions and neuronal networks may be protected unequally by different anticonvulsants.
本研究比较了卡马西平(20毫克/千克/天)和氨己烯酸(250毫克/千克/天)在大鼠癫痫持续状态穿通通路刺激模型中预防海马和杏仁核损伤的疗效。一组大鼠接受了联合用药。药物治疗在刺激前一周开始,并在刺激后持续两周。采用Gallyas银浸染法和生长抑素免疫组织化学法检测神经元损伤。所有药物治疗在减少电刺激期间癫痫发作的次数和严重程度方面同样有效。在氨己烯酸组中,门区生长抑素免疫反应性(SOM-ir)神经元和海马CA3c锥体细胞的损伤比溶剂对照组(SOM-ir,P<0.01;CA3c,P<0.05)和卡马西平组(SOM-ir,P<0.01;CA3c,P<0.05)更轻。在卡马西平组和联合用药组中,海马神经元损伤的严重程度与溶剂对照组动物没有差异。任何一种治疗方法都不能保护杏仁核神经元。我们的结果表明,尽管在穿通通路刺激期间氨己烯酸和卡马西平治疗具有相似的抗惊厥疗效,但只有氨己烯酸而非卡马西平能减少癫痫发作诱导的神经元损伤。氨己烯酸减少了海马中的神经元损伤,但没有减少杏仁核中的神经元损伤。这些结果表明,不同的脑区和神经元网络可能受到不同抗惊厥药物的不同程度保护。