Cornell D G, Warren J, Hawk G, Stafford E, Oram G, Pine D
Program in Clinical Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22903-2495, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Aug;64(4):783-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.4.783.
Can violent offenders who commit acts of instrumental aggression for goal-oriented purposes such as robbery be distinguished from those who commit acts of reactive (or hostile) aggression in response to provocation? Because violent offenders often have a history of both instrumental and reactive aggression, this study distinguished between offenders with a history of at least 1 instrumental violent offense and offenders with a history of reactive violent offenses. Two studies tested the hypothesis that instrumental offenders would score higher than reactive offenders and nonviolent offenders on R. D. Hare's (1991) Psychopathy Checklist. The first study sample consisted of 106 violent and nonviolent offenders recruited from a medium-security correctional facility. The second study sample consisted of 50 violent offenders referred for pretrial forensic evaluation. In both samples, instrumental offenders could be reliably distinguished from reactive offenders on the basis of violent crime behavior and level of psychopathy. Group differences could not be attributed to participant age, race, length of incarceration, or extent of prior criminal record.
那些为了抢劫等目标导向目的而实施工具性攻击行为的暴力罪犯,能否与那些因受到挑衅而实施反应性(或敌意性)攻击行为的罪犯区分开来?由于暴力罪犯通常既有工具性攻击行为的历史,也有反应性攻击行为的历史,本研究区分了有至少一次工具性暴力犯罪历史的罪犯和有反应性暴力犯罪历史的罪犯。两项研究检验了这样一个假设:在R.D.黑尔(1991年)的《精神病态检查表》上,工具性犯罪者的得分会高于反应性犯罪者和非暴力犯罪者。第一项研究样本由从一个中等安全级别的惩教机构招募的106名暴力和非暴力罪犯组成。第二项研究样本由50名被转介进行审前法医评估的暴力罪犯组成。在两个样本中,根据暴力犯罪行为和精神病态水平,工具性犯罪者能够与反应性犯罪者可靠地区分开来。组间差异不能归因于参与者的年龄、种族、监禁时长或先前犯罪记录的程度。