Lääperi A L
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
Acta Radiol Suppl. 1996;407:1-54.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the cost structure of radiological procedures in the intermediary referral hospitals and general practice and to develop a cost accounting system for radiological examinations that takes into consideration all relevant cost factors and is suitable for management of radiology departments and regional planning of radiological resources. The material comprised 174,560 basic radiological examinations performed in 1991 at 5 intermediate referral hospitals and 13 public health centres in the Pirkanmaa Hospital District in Finland. All radiological departments in the hospitals were managed by a specialist in radiology. The radiology departments at the public health care centres operated on a self-referral basis by general practitioners. The data were extracted from examination lists, inventories and balance sheets; parts of the data were estimated or calculated. The radiological examinations were compiled according to the type of examination and equipment used: conventional, contrast medium, ultrasound, mammography and roentgen examinations with mobile equipment. The majority of the examinations (87%) comprised conventional radiography. For cost analysis the cost items were grouped into 5 cost factors: personnel, equipment, material, real estate and administration costs. The depreciation time used was 10 years for roentgen equipment, 5 years for ultrasound equipment and 5 to 10 years for other capital goods. An annual interest rate of 10% was applied. Standard average values based on a sample at 2 hospitals were used for the examination-specific radiologist time, radiographer time and material costs. Four cost accounting versions with varying allocation of the major cost items were designed. Two-way analysis of variance of the effect of different allocation methods on the costs and cost structure of the examination groups was performed. On the basis of the cost analysis a cost accounting program containing both monetary and nonmonetary variables was developed. In it the radiologist, radiographer and examination-specific equipment costs were allocated to the examinations applying estimated cost equivalents. Some minor cost items were replaced by a general cost factor (GCF). The program is suitable for internal cost accounting of radiological departments as well as regional planning. If more accurate cost information is required, cost assignment employing the actual consumption of the resources and applying the principles of activity-based cost accounting is recommended. As an application of the cost accounting formula the average costs of the radiological examinations were calculated. In conventional radiography the average proportion of the cost factors in the total material was: personnel costs 43%, equipment costs 26%, material costs 7%, real estate costs 11%, administration and overheads 14%. The average total costs including radiologist costs in the hospitals were (FIM): conventional roentgen examinations 188, contrast medium examinations 695, ultrasound 296, mammography 315, roentgen examinations with mobile equipment 1578. The average total costs without radiologist costs in the public health centres were (FIM): conventional roentgen examinations 107, contrast medium examinations 988, ultrasound 203, mammography 557. The average currency rate of exchange in 1991 was USD 1 = FIM 4.046. The following formula is proposed for calculating the cost of a radiological examination (or a group of examinations) performed with a certain piece of equipment during a period of time (e.g. 1 year): a2/ sigma axax+ b2/ sigma bxbx+ d1/d5*dx+ e1 + [(c1+ c2) + d4 + (e2 - e3) + f5 + g1+ g2+ i]/n.
本研究的目的是分析中级转诊医院和全科医疗中放射检查的成本结构,并开发一种放射检查成本核算系统,该系统要考虑到所有相关成本因素,适用于放射科管理和放射资源的区域规划。研究材料包括1991年在芬兰皮尔卡马医院区的5家中级转诊医院和13个公共卫生中心进行的174,560项基本放射检查。医院的所有放射科均由放射科专家管理。公共卫生保健中心的放射科由全科医生自行转诊运作。数据从检查清单、库存和资产负债表中提取;部分数据是估算或计算得出的。放射检查根据检查类型和使用的设备进行分类:传统检查、造影剂检查、超声检查、乳腺摄影以及使用移动设备的X射线检查。大部分检查(87%)为传统X射线摄影。为进行成本分析,成本项目被归为5个成本因素:人员、设备、材料、房地产和管理成本。X射线设备的折旧年限为10年,超声设备为5年,其他资本货物为5至10年。年利率采用10%。基于2家医院的样本得出的标准平均值用于特定检查的放射科医生时间、放射技师时间和材料成本。设计了4种主要成本项目分配方式不同的成本核算版本。对不同分配方法对检查组成本和成本结构的影响进行了双向方差分析。在成本分析的基础上,开发了一个包含货币和非货币变量的成本核算程序。在该程序中,放射科医生、放射技师和特定检查设备成本通过应用估计成本当量分配到各项检查中。一些小额成本项目被一个通用成本因素(GCF)取代。该程序适用于放射科的内部成本核算以及区域规划。如果需要更准确的成本信息,建议采用基于资源实际消耗并应用作业成本核算原则的成本分配方法。作为成本核算公式的应用,计算了放射检查的平均成本。在传统X射线摄影中,成本因素在总成本中的平均占比为:人员成本43%,设备成本26%,材料成本7%,房地产成本11%,管理及间接费用14%。医院中包括放射科医生成本在内的平均总成本(芬兰马克)为:传统X射线检查188,造影剂检查695,超声检查296,乳腺摄影315,移动设备X射线检查1578。公共卫生中心不包括放射科医生成本的平均总成本(芬兰马克)为:传统X射线检查107,造影剂检查988,超声检查203,乳腺摄影557。1991年的平均汇率为1美元 = 4.046芬兰马克。建议采用以下公式计算在一段时间(如1年)内使用某台设备进行的放射检查(或一组检查)的成本:a2 / ∑ax * ax + b2 / ∑bx * bx + d1 / d5 * dx + e1 + [(c1 + c2) + d4 + (e2 - e3) + f5 + g1 + g2 + i] / n。