Brasel K J, Borgstrom D C, Meyer P, Weigelt J A
University of Minnesota, St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center 55101, USA.
J Trauma. 1996 Sep;41(3):484-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199609000-00016.
Identify outcome predictors in blunt diaphragm rupture (BDR).
Retrospective chart and trauma registry review.
We reviewed records of patients with BDR from January 1987 through May 1994 for outcomes of mortality, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and ventilator days. Predictors tested were age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), diagnostic delay, rupture side, head injury, and associated injuries. Stepwise regression models were developed and tested on an additional data base of 115 BDR records from four trauma centers.
Thirty-two patients were identified. Age was the only significant predictor for all outcomes (p < 0.05). Age, ISS, and severe head injury were mortality predictors. In the larger data base, age and ISS remained predictive of mortality, but age was not predictive of morbidity.
Age and ISS are predictive of BDR mortality. No morbidity predictor was validated in the larger data base. These data emphasize that predictive models from a single institution should be applied cautiously.
确定钝性膈肌破裂(BDR)的预后预测因素。
回顾性病历及创伤登记审查。
我们回顾了1987年1月至1994年5月期间BDR患者的记录,以了解死亡率、重症监护病房住院时间、住院时间和呼吸机使用天数等预后情况。所测试的预测因素包括年龄、性别、损伤严重度评分(ISS)、诊断延迟、破裂侧、头部损伤及相关损伤。建立逐步回归模型,并在来自四个创伤中心的115份BDR记录的另一个数据库上进行测试。
共确定32例患者。年龄是所有预后的唯一显著预测因素(p < 0.05)。年龄、ISS及严重头部损伤是死亡率的预测因素。在更大的数据库中,年龄和ISS仍然是死亡率的预测因素,但年龄不是发病率的预测因素。
年龄和ISS可预测BDR死亡率。在更大的数据库中未验证有发病率预测因素。这些数据强调,来自单一机构的预测模型应谨慎应用。