Atta H R, Dick A D, Hamed L M, Byrne S F, Gendron E K, Hughes R L, Glaser J S
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Aberdeen.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Feb;80(2):129-34. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.2.129.
A variety of acute and chronic orbitopathies may be distinguished by standardised echography. Venous stasis orbitopathy (VSO) often presents with orbital signs when secondary to cavernous sinus and middle cranial fossa disorders. In this study, the aim was to assess whether differentiation between vascular and nonvascular causes of VSO could be made on the basis of clinical and echographic features at the time of presentation.
This study comprised 37 patients with echographic features of VSO (17 patients with arteriovenous fistulae, confirmed by computed tomography imaging or angiography, and 20 patients with non-vascular diseases). Excluded were patients with orbital mass lesions detected by echography and muscle enlargement due to other causes (for example, orbital myositis). Patients with a suspected mass involving the orbital apex and echographic features of VSO were included. After full neuro-ophthalmic and ocular examination, both orbits were examined to document maximal thickness and reflectivity of four recti muscles and compared with the normal contralateral orbit with standardised A-scan (Kretz-technik 7200MA or Ophthascan) and contact B-scan (Ultrascan or Ophthascan S).
Cumulative ocular recti muscle thickness was significantly greater in patients with arteriovenous fistulae compared with the non-fistula group (23.3 (SD 3.7) and 17.8 (2) mm, p = 0.001). Clinically, the presence of a bruit and a uniocular rise in intraocular pressure were significantly greater in the fistula group of patients.
Standardised echography is a safe and non-invasive method of diagnosing VSO in patients presenting with signs of proptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and inflammation of the conjunctiva. Furthermore, using these standard techniques the two major causes of VSO (arteriovenous fistulae and compressive mass lesions) could be differentiated.
多种急性和慢性眼眶病可通过标准化超声检查加以区分。静脉淤滞性眼眶病(VSO)继发于海绵窦和中颅窝疾病时,常伴有眼眶体征。本研究旨在评估能否根据VSO患者就诊时的临床和超声特征,区分其血管性和非血管性病因。
本研究纳入37例具有VSO超声特征的患者(17例经计算机断层扫描成像或血管造影确诊为动静脉瘘,20例患有非血管性疾病)。排除超声检查发现眼眶肿块病变以及因其他原因(如眼眶肌炎)导致肌肉增大的患者。纳入疑似累及眶尖且具有VSO超声特征的患者。在进行全面的神经眼科和眼科检查后,对双眼眶进行检查,记录四条直肌的最大厚度和反射率,并与对侧正常眼眶进行标准化A超(Kretz-technik 7200MA或Ophthascan)和接触式B超(Ultrascan或Ophthascan S)比较。
与非瘘管组相比,动静脉瘘患者的眼直肌累积厚度显著更大(分别为23.3(标准差3.7)和17.8(2)mm,p = 0.001)。临床上,瘘管组患者出现血管杂音和单眼眼压升高的情况明显更多。
标准化超声检查是一种安全、无创的方法,可用于诊断出现眼球突出、眼肌麻痹和结膜炎症体征的VSO患者。此外,使用这些标准技术可区分VSO的两种主要病因(动静脉瘘和压迫性肿块病变)。