Suppr超能文献

α干扰素与传统化疗治疗慢性粒细胞白血病的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha and conventional chemotherapy in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

作者信息

Kattan M W, Inoue Y, Giles F J, Talpaz M, Ozer H, Guilhot F, Zuffa E, Huber S L, Beck J R

机构信息

Information Technology Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 1;125(7):541-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-7-199610010-00002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha with that of hydroxyurea as initial therapy for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase.

DESIGN

A decision analysis and Markov model that described the natural history of the therapeutic process. The Markov model contained two treatment arms (interferon-alpha and hydroxyurea) and eight states of health (complete hematologic remission with cytogenetic response, complete hematologic remission without cytogenetic response, partial hematologic remission, chronic phase without hematologic remission, accelerated phase, blast crisis, bone marrow transplantation, and death). Probabilities, costs, and utilities were obtained from published clinical studies and clinical investigators.

MEASUREMENT

Quality-adjusted years of life saved and costs and qualities discounted at 5% per year.

SETTING

University medical centers in North America and Europe.

PATIENTS

Meta-analysis of results from patients studied in clinical trials.

RESULTS

The model's predictions of median survival (69 months with interferon-alpha therapy and 58 months with hydroxyurea therapy) were derived from data in the recent literature. In patients 50 years of age, interferon-alpha improved life expectancy over hydroxyurea by approximately 18 months. The marginal cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha (incremental discounted cost of interferon-alpha compared with that of conventional therapy) was $34800 per quality-adjusted year of life saved. The model was sensitive to the monthly cost of interferon-alpha therapy (if the cost of interferon-alpha is reduced by one third, the cost-effectiveness becomes $19300 per quality-adjusted year of life saved) but was not particularly sensitive to the costs associated with blast crisis or bone marrow transplantation. The other significant variable was quality of life during therapy with interferon-alpha; when this measure was varied from 70% to 100% of the quality of life during hydroxyurea therapy, cost-effectiveness changed from $123200 to $25620 per quality-adjusted year of life saved. When the quality of life associated with interferon-alpha was less than 62% of the quality of life associated with hydroxyurea, the discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy with interferon-alpha was less than that with hydroxyurea.

CONCLUSION

Compared with hydroxyurea, interferon-alpha is, in most clinical scenarios, a cost-effective initial therapy for patients with chronic-phase CML who can tolerate the drug.

摘要

目的

比较α干扰素与羟基脲作为慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)慢性期患者初始治疗的成本效益。

设计

一种描述治疗过程自然史的决策分析和马尔可夫模型。该马尔可夫模型包含两个治疗组(α干扰素和羟基脲)以及八种健康状态(伴有细胞遗传学反应的完全血液学缓解、不伴有细胞遗传学反应的完全血液学缓解、部分血液学缓解、无血液学缓解的慢性期、加速期、急变期、骨髓移植和死亡)。概率、成本和效用值来自已发表的临床研究及临床研究人员。

测量指标

质量调整生命年的节省量以及每年按5%贴现的成本和质量。

研究地点

北美和欧洲的大学医学中心。

患者

对临床试验中所研究患者的结果进行荟萃分析。

结果

模型对中位生存期的预测(α干扰素治疗为69个月,羟基脲治疗为58个月)源自近期文献中的数据。在50岁的患者中,α干扰素比羟基脲使预期寿命延长约18个月。α干扰素的边际成本效益(与传统治疗相比,α干扰素的增量贴现成本)为每挽救一个质量调整生命年34800美元。该模型对α干扰素治疗的月成本敏感(如果α干扰素的成本降低三分之一,成本效益变为每质量调整生命年19300美元),但对与急变期或骨髓移植相关的成本不太敏感。另一个重要变量是α干扰素治疗期间的生活质量;当该指标在羟基脲治疗期间生活质量的70%至100%之间变化时,成本效益从每质量调整生命年123200美元变为25620美元。当与α干扰素相关的生活质量低于与羟基脲相关生活质量的62%时,α干扰素的贴现质量调整预期寿命低于羟基脲。

结论

与羟基脲相比,在大多数临床情况下,α干扰素对于能够耐受该药物的慢性期CML患者是一种具有成本效益的初始治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验