Liberato N L, Quaglini S, Barosi G
Laboratory of Medical Informatics, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jul;15(7):2673-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2673.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interferon alfa (IFN alpha) treatment of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia relative to conventional chemotherapy.
A decision-analysis model that involved a multistate Markov process was designed to estimate the expected cost and quality-adjusted life expectancies for two cohorts of patients to be administered conventional chemotherapy or IFN alpha. Two IFN alpha strategies were modeled: prolonged treatment for patients who achieved a hematologic response (scenario A) or only for patients who achieved a cytogenetic remission in a 2-year period (scenario B). Data on response and transition probabilities between health states were obtained from the literature by a MEDLINE search and pooled with a meta-analytic method. Costs were based on local charges. Expected survival was adjusted for quality of life on the basis of an expert panel judgment.
Baseline analysis showed IFN alpha treatment to increase the quality-adjusted life expectancy by 15.5 and 12.5 months relative to conventional chemotherapy, in scenarios A and B, respectively. Marginal cost-effectiveness was $89,500 and $63,500 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis confirmed IFN alpha as the most effective approach. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive to the cost of IFN alpha therapy and to the assumptions about the rate of cytogenetic remission. Reducing the drug dose, as suggested by a recent report, would decrease the marginal cost-effectiveness to less than $20,000.
IFN alpha is substantially superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of quality-adjusted survival, but, at the current doses, marginal cost-effectiveness ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 per QALY gained under most of our assumptions.
评估与传统化疗相比,干扰素α(IFNα)治疗慢性粒细胞白血病患者的成本效益。
设计了一个涉及多状态马尔可夫过程的决策分析模型,以估计接受传统化疗或IFNα治疗的两组患者的预期成本和质量调整预期寿命。对两种IFNα策略进行了建模:对血液学缓解的患者进行长期治疗(方案A)或仅对在两年内实现细胞遗传学缓解的患者进行治疗(方案B)。通过MEDLINE检索从文献中获取健康状态之间的反应和转移概率数据,并采用荟萃分析方法进行汇总。成本基于当地收费。根据专家小组的判断,对预期生存进行生活质量调整。
基线分析显示,在方案A和方案B中,IFNα治疗相对于传统化疗分别将质量调整预期寿命提高了15.5个月和12.5个月。每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的边际成本效益分别为89,500美元和63,500美元。敏感性分析证实IFNα是最有效的方法。成本效益结果对IFNα治疗成本和细胞遗传学缓解率的假设敏感。正如最近一份报告所建议的那样,降低药物剂量将使边际成本效益降至20,000美元以下。
在质量调整生存方面,IFNα明显优于传统化疗,但在当前剂量下,根据我们的大多数假设,每获得一个QALY的边际成本效益在50,000美元至100,000美元之间。